Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4) abolishing services, activities and functions not necessary to the efficient <br />conduct of government. <br /> <br />Ms. Kelly seconded the motion and all commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox stated there was a notion of sub-committees and the ability to <br />individually look at particular departments. Mr. Matsuda stated it was good to have two <br />people because what one person didn’t think of the other person did. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox asked the commission for their thoughts. <br /> <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz and Mr. Mitchell liked the idea of teams. <br /> <br />Ms. Kelly asked if the sub-committee meetings with the department could be <br />audio recorded. Mr. Mitchell stated not everyone would like that and Mr. Matsuda <br />agreed but said he would go with the majority. <br /> <br />Ms. Kelly asked if a report of the meeting with the department heads were turned <br />in to the commission. Mr. Matsuda replied it was all verbal. <br /> <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz asked if the commissioners are going to break up into sub- <br />committees and would the sub-committees be responsible for producing a write-up for <br />the rest of the commissioners to work off of. Mr. Matsuda stated there wasn’t any <br />difficulty coming up with notes and discussing what was discussed with the individual <br />departments and it was presented to the commission that way. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson commented that some sub-committees passed out a report. She <br />also noted that if the sub-committees wanted their meetings recorded, they should invite <br />the departments to the commission meeting since it is already being recorded. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox confirmed that the commission wanted to have sub-committees. <br />She stated the commissioners should be thinking about questions to ask the <br />departments and bring it back to the next meeting for discussion. She also asked the <br />commissioners to read the previous reports before the next meeting and discuss what <br />would be a high priority on where the commission should start and focus on to develop <br />a strategy for going forward. <br /> <br />(Break: 11:38 a.m. – 11:48 a.m.) <br /> <br />10. ITEMS TO BE PLACE ON THE NEXT AGENDA <br /> <br /> Ms. Maddox stated the standing agenda items would be: <br /> <br />Call the meeting to order <br />Statements from the public <br />Discussion/action regarding approach to take to timely accomplish <br />mandate of the Cost of Government Commission <br />Items to be placed on the next agenda <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />