Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> Fire – Mr. Matsuda <br /> Housing – Ms. Kierkiewicz; Mr. Mitchell <br /> Human Resources – Ms. Maddox <br /> Immigration <br /> Information Technology – Ms. Kierkiewicz; Mr. Mitchell <br /> Liquor <br /> Mass Transit – Ms. Kierkiewicz; Mr. Perry <br /> Mayor <br /> Parks – Mr. Mitchell; Mr. Matsuda <br /> Planning – Mr. Perry <br /> Police – Ms. Maddox <br /> Prosecuting Attorney – Ms. Kierkiewicz <br /> Public Works – Mr. Matsuda <br /> Research & Development – Ms. Kierkiewicz <br /> Water Supply – Mr. Perry; Mr. Matsuda <br /> <br />Ms. Garson said for Sunshine Law purposes, to form a sub-committee, two <br />members can get together and discuss board business as long as there is no <br />commitment to vote. <br /> <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz asked if Ms. Kualii could email the list of departments to the <br />group. Ms. Garson replied that it would depend on what the responses are. If there <br />needs to be any discussion about who’s going to do what, it would have to be brought <br />up at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Perry asked what is the relationship between the list of departments and the <br />list talked about earlier which are energy, finance and technology. Ms. Kierkiewicz said <br />when looking at the departments, the Commissioners need to keep those three things in <br />mind (energy, finance and technology) to come up with the recommendations; the <br />Commission wants to take a systemic approach and see what is related in each <br />department. <br /> <br />Ms. Garson said for the letters going out to the boards and commissions, <br />because they are bound by Sunshine Law as well, the Commissioners can talk to the <br />chair of that board or commission but if they want to collectively talk to the board or <br />commission, you would have to go to their meetings. <br /> <br />5.REVIEW DRAFT LETTERS TO DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS AND <br />COMMISSIONS, COUNTY CLERK, COUNTY COUNCIL AND EMPLOYEES <br />REQUESTING INFORMATION <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox stated that devising uniform questions to be posed to each <br />department would give consistency across the board. Ms. Maddox asked if everyone <br />had a chance to review the draft letters. Mr. Mitchell replied he thought it was very well <br />done. Ms. Maddox asked if the response date of March 20 was a reasonable period of <br />time to have the letters distributed in time to meet the response date. Ms. Garson <br />replied the distribution is not difficult; the one to the employees will be distributed with <br />their payroll so will need to check with Finance for their deadline. Ms. Maddox asked if <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />