My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-01-08 Board of Ethics Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2014
>
2014-01-08 Board of Ethics Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2014 10:31:34 AM
Creation date
5/22/2014 10:31:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommendations. There has to be that impact, and the person who is actually <br />inputting—reviewing and then inputting that is at the administrative level. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: But if it’s not affecting her property, then why make the <br />recommendation? <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: I guess I’m saying that we’re talking about impacting—someone <br />assessing their individual property versus the mass appraisal— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: --That’s what I’m getting at— <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: --of the entire 2,000 properties in the neighborhood and— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: --That’s exactly what I’m getting to. What is the distinction, you see? <br />Undoubtedly we both agree, if it were a direct appraisal it would be verboten by the <br />Ethics Code, right—we couldn’t do it, right? You know that, because it’s a direct <br />appraisal. <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: Right, and that’s how I read— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: --I mean if it’s a one on one appraisal— <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: --and that’s how I read the petition. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: If it’s one on one you can’t do it, right? <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: That’s how I read the petition to read. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Okay, but if it’s one on one, we both agree you can’t do it, right? <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: Right. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Okay. <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: We have processes in place to ensure that does not happen. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: And it says here, in your own conflict of interest policy, not to do it if it’s <br />one on one. It says so right here, on your own paper. All right, now I’m asking you, <br />because it goes into the mass area, does that take it outside that area that’s forbidden? <br />So that would be your position now, because it’s a mass appraisal? It’s no longer <br />forbidden because it’s not an individual appraisal. You see what I’m saying? <br /> <br />MS. CRAWFORD: I guess my position is that it is so diluted by the process— <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: --That’s what I’m asking— <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.