Laserfiche WebLink
<br />may have to go into some kind of litigation or reach some kind of agreement, but they have <br />buildings encroaching onto our property, and that’s the reason we haven’t put the fence back up. <br />That’s pretty much, I’m available for questions. I’m in agreement with everything else. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Okay, sir, so you have received the Planning Director’s Background Report, and <br />it seems like your big issues are with number 3 and number 6. <br /> <br />GADD: Yeah and number, and then the fence, but those are, they’re minor issues. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Okay, any questions from the Commissioners for the applicant? I have a question <br />that’s actually probably for you, Jeff. There’s been reference to Conditions 8 and 9 but I don’t <br />see anything about those in the Recommendation. <br /> <br />DARROW: The, Condition No. 8, when you look at Exhibit No. 1, which is the applicant’s <br />original request, we kind of were looking at his request and when he would say the applicant <br />requests, then we would put that in. Under No. 8, he really wasn’t requesting anything. It was <br />basically just information that he was providing. He may, for us the conditions still remains the <br />same. The chain link fence was required to be there, it’s not there. So, what he said was within <br />his request it says, the chain link fence which was previously installed was removed for <br />construction. A retaining wall was constructed along the adjacent properties. The retaining wall <br />is only along a portion of the properties. It doesn’t go along the entire adjoining properties that’s <br />required for the chain link fence. So again, it was unclear that he was asking for anything <br />originally so at this point, we would recommend that the condition remain as it is. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Okay, and I have a question on Condition No. 6 with the traffic signal. You said <br />that at this point, there is no plans by Department of Transportation or anybody to even put a <br />signal in there? <br /> <br />DARROW: We’ve inquired extensively regarding plans for Orchidland Drive and, <br />unfortunately, we have not received any specific information as to that. There, there has been <br />studies done, and assessments or impact statements done regarding the improvements. They are <br />improving a portion from Kea‘au to the beginning of Paradise Park, but at this point, it’s unclear <br />as to the specific improvements that will be, that are proposed for Orchidland Drive. We’ve <br />asked and we just haven’t been provided direct information. <br /> <br />GONZALES: Okay, so if we hold him to Condition No. 6, are we really even holding him to <br />anything? <br /> <br />DARROW: It’s going to be up to the Department of Transportation at the time of certificate of <br />occupancy if they require anything of the applicant to make a, a request at that time. <br /> <br />GONZALES: And so when do you anticipate applying for your certificate of occupancy? <br /> <br />GADD: Hopefully within six months. <br /> <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />