Laserfiche WebLink
The Manager-Chief Engineer said that DWS could take a good look at the scope of the work, and <br />probably could include the basal wells as well as the high-level wells. This could include both North <br />and South Kona, he said. <br /> <br />Mr. Uyeda said he is not a geologist; he asked if it made a difference whether all of the wells were <br />included. He asked whether DWS should concentrate on the high-level wells, which may not affect the <br />basal water. He said he did not know; that was the reason for his question. <br /> <br />The Manager-Chief Engineer said that DWS definitely does not know, and the idea is to try to know. <br /> <br />The Deputy said DWS could incorporate some kind of simultaneous monitoring of a down-gradient <br />basal source, as well as the high-level water. The reason that the basal wells were not initially included <br />is that DWS is monitoring the basal wells for chlorides in-house. However, Mr. Uyeda’s suggestion is a <br />good one, and DWS can do simultaneous monitoring. <br /> <br />Mr. Uyeda said that maybe the monitoring could instead be in certain strategic points where there are <br />upstream high-level wells; that might be really beneficial. <br /> <br />The Manager-Chief Engineer said that it would be great to know whether or not a well is going to affect <br />another well that is in the basal aquifer immediately downstream of that well, especially when DWS <br />does pump testing, etc. He said that DWS could come up with a good strategy to get that kind of <br />information. <br /> <br />Mr. Uyeda asked how much above and beyond what DWS is already doing this new study would <br />achieve, based on DOH requirements to report monthly. <br /> <br />The Manager-Chief Engineer said that it would be a little bit more, because DOH only requires <br />information such as chloride levels, and CWRM requires reports of DWS’s pumpage (i.e., not water <br />level information). Knowing what DWS’s water levels are would be helpful, and the 12-month study <br />would show whether or not water levels fluctuate. Water levels could be affected by the tides; the levels <br />are definitely affected by rainfall. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinson asked for confirmation that DWS will bid this project out, and the Department will show <br />the Board the scope of the contract regarding what information will be requested from the contractor. <br /> <br />The Manager-Chief Engineer said he was pretty sure that DWS can present the Board with the scope of <br />work, to better understand what DWS is getting for this work. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinson asked whether the information will include things like elevation of the water, salinity, etc. <br /> <br />The Deputy noted that the Item involves a request for approval of a Professional Services Agreement, <br />which is a different method of procurement. If the Board is not comfortable with approving at this time, <br />the Department can come before the Board with a more defined scope before proceeding with this <br />procurement. <br /> <br />Mr. Robinson said he is in favor of approving, but he would just like to see the scope. <br /> <br />The Deputy said DWS can certainly provide that. <br /> <br />Ms. Lee Loy agreed that she wanted to see the scope, too. She said that Mr. Uyeda touched on a <br />snapshot of the high-level wells vis a vis what is going on with basal wells in strategic locations; this <br />will give the Board a good understanding of what is going on. She said that if that could be folded into <br />the scope, it would make her feel a lot better. <br /> <br />Page 13 of 27 Water Board Minutes 5-27-14 js <br /> <br /> <br />