My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-02-26 Minutes Salary Commission
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-02-26 Minutes Salary Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2016 10:21:32 AM
Creation date
9/24/2014 12:57:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />February 26, 2014 <br />Chair Lassiter inquired whether the Deputy Police Chief is involved in a SHOPO <br />automatic raise at the first of the year and then another increase in July. <br />Ms. Toriano replied that all of the positions listed in the proposals fall under the <br />purview of the Salary Commission. <br />Proposal #4: Again, it reflects a 4% across-the-board increase with the <br />exception of those highlighted in yellow, which includes the Mayor, <br />Managing Director, Deputy Managing Director, Parks and Recreation <br />Director, and the Parks and Recreation Deputy Director. <br />Chair Lassiter thanked Ms. Toriano for a job well done. Ms. Toriano thanked her <br />for her guidance, and that she couldn't have done it without the support of the staff <br />that did all the work. <br />Chair Lassiter asked the Commissioners if they had any questions for Ms. Toriano. <br />There were none. <br />Ms. Stebbins informed the Commission that they could now entertain a motion <br />regarding acceptance of any of the proposals. Chair Lassiter asked the <br />Commission for a motion on the proposals. <br />Motion: Mr. De Lima stated that he's not comfortable with any of the proposals, but for <br />purposes of discussion, moved for the adoption of Proposal #1. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Sumja. <br />Mr. De Lima reiterated that he's uncomfortable with voting on any of the <br />proposals today. He's not supportive of increasing the Mayor's salary given his <br />public position on the increase. We could adopt the Mayor's increase effective the <br />year his term expires, so the person who runs for this office would know what the <br />salary is going to be. When the person gets elected, they could take the same <br />position that they're not going to receive any increase until the next election. The <br />same would apply for the Prosecuting Attorney. Mr. De Lima commented that <br />he's just thinking out loud and he's not proposing that the changes be made now. <br />Mr. De Lima stated that he's always thought the Corporation Counsel should be <br />paid a little bit more, equal to the Prosecuting Attorney. They both run large law <br />offices. As far as the Fire and Police Chiefs, he's okay with them having a higher <br />pay than the other Cabinet members. They report to the commission, run large <br />operations that are highly skilled, undergo training, and he considers them a public <br />safety tier in itself. <br />Mr. De Lima further commented that for the remaining positions, he supports <br />equalizing the salaries. There's the Information Technology Director who has a <br />small staff but has a very important job and is in the smallest tier. We get the best <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.