Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> Motion and Vote <br />: Ms. Kierkiewicz moved to include this recommendation into <br />the draft report subject to additional language consideration. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Perry and all commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br />F. Explore a flexible schedule model for employees. <br /> <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz stated this recommendation came from looking through all <br />the letters and reflecting on the meetings they’ve had with the different department <br />heads. Ms. Kierkiewicz stated Ms. Kelly wanted to know how employees would be kept <br />accountable for their flex time and thinks it’s something the Commission should <br />consider recommending. Mr. Espejo thinks its fine as written. Ms. Maddox thinks there <br />are a number of employees that already take advantage of flexible schedules and <br />Ms. Kelly’s concern was the accountability factor, if employees are doing that. Mr. Perry <br />stated he asked this question to the Water Department and would favor trying out a <br />4-day week, with some people working on Fridays and some people working on <br />Mondays. Ms. Kierkiewicz doesn’t want to get too specific and thinks the more general <br />the better. Ms. Garson replied the 4-day/10-hour is part of collective bargaining, it is not <br />in the agreements now but it can be explored which is what the recommendation says. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kierkiewicz asked Ms. Garson if the Commission needed to be more specific <br />then what is stated. Ms. Garson replied the Commission can provide examples for the <br />report. Ms. Maddox agrees with the way it reads now with the inclusion of examples. <br />Mr. Mitchell thinks it’s wonderful and in looking at page 11 of the last report, it gives <br />specific language they could use. Ms. Kierkiewicz said they could also highlight the <br />success in certain departments, like Research and Development, who have flex <br />schedules. Ms. Maddox clarified this recommendation will be carried forward to the <br />next meeting. Ms. Garson asked if the recommendation should be moved into the draft <br />report. Ms. Kierkiewicz asked if they could still talk about examples at the next meeting. <br />Ms. Garson replied, yes, and it can also be discussed in the draft report. <br /> <br />Motion and Vote <br />: Ms. Kierkiewicz moved to include this recommendation into <br />the draft report subject to additional language consideration. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Matsuda and all commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br />G. Explore use of debit and credit cards at the Department of Motor <br />Vehicles. <br /> <br />Ms. Maddox asked Ms. Kierkiewicz if she wanted to continue with this <br />recommendation. Ms. Kierkiewicz said she believes this came up during one of their <br />discussions on the inability to pay for vehicle stickers with a debit or credit card; only <br />cash or checks is accepted. She said this does not need to recommend a specific <br />system, but to explore this. <br /> <br />Motion and Vote <br />: Mr. Matsuda moved to include this recommendation into <br />the draft report subject to additional language consideration. The motion was <br />seconded by Mr. Perry and all commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />