My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-01-26 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-01-26 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2015 10:44:56 AM
Creation date
3/18/2015 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes — January 26, 2015 <br />and clearly there are some rights under there for the DLNR to do that — <br />and they're extending it because they have those management rights — <br />that means that they can do this aerial hunting. <br />KD: So they instead of work with the public — they can decide not to and just <br />say naw we're not going to work with the public — we just gonna take <br />means into our own hands and basically whatever anybody has as far as, <br />you know, the State constitution, as far as gathering rights and what have <br />you — and for feed their family and that's one resource — they out the door <br />because the State says naw, we're not going work with them — we not <br />going give nobody one chance — we just going take `em up. So basically <br />that's the attitude. That's what I'm hearing... <br />LM: Yeah. It sounds like that is the State's attitude but I don't think there's <br />anything illegal about it. There are some statutes that clearly indicate that <br />the department — that DLNR should be working with the public and the <br />groups interested in it — but I don't think that would create a cause of <br />action — if they didn't... <br />KD: Is there any records or files that is stating that they went work with the <br />public and asked them if they could come out and like say give them a <br />year or two to try and see if they could do the hunting instead, instead of <br />just go out and do the determination? <br />LM: No, there's no requirement like that that I've come across. <br />KD: That's what I figured. <br />DY: Do you know when specifically these animals were determined to be <br />invasive? Who determined that? <br />•[7iiii.Tti <br />DY: So some bureaucrat in the DLNR could just say oh we should just call <br />these guys invasive and it becomes invasive? <br />LM: Honestly, I don't know. But at some level these are functions that you do <br />expect the government to do, right, you do expect the government to <br />determine when certain animals become a nuisance or when they need — <br />what management activity should take — should occur, right, so it's not that <br />unusual. I think the frustration is a large part of the community feels <br />excluded and not listened to — that their input is not being heard. <br />TL: That's correct. One thing about — in answer to Kalani's question — if there's <br />federal monies involved in any of these activities — the public has to be <br />included — now whether they're using some other organization to satisfy <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.