My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-01-26 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
2015-01-26 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2015 10:44:56 AM
Creation date
3/18/2015 10:44:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes — January 26, 2015 <br />DY: So in the State of Hawaii — the federal government is allowed to aerially <br />eradicate in the palila habitat area? <br />LM: The federal government can aerial eradicate wherever it wants. <br />DY: I see ... And does it have the authority to do that in Hawaii? <br />LM: Yes. Under the supremacy clause — the federal government can make <br />laws that are gonna trump state law or local laws and that's what they've <br />done. They've permitted themselves to do aerial hunting. <br />DY: They've actually said that for Hawaii? <br />LM: That's the federal law. Whether they're exercising that right is another <br />thing. <br />DY: So they haven't really specified for themselves that power or authority in <br />Hawaii? It's just a general... <br />LM: It's nationwide the law. <br />TS: Only on federal land, though, not over state land? <br />LM: I'd have to look — to tell you the truth. <br />TS: Because on the mainland it's mostly federal land. <br />LM: I would assume so. <br />TS: That's part of land management — is federal land — whereas Hawaii is <br />state. <br />LM: Yeah, I would assume so. You could imagine that there would be certain <br />constitutional rights and property rights that an individual would have, you <br />know, that would prevent the federal government from coming and <br />destroying your property... But the way the law's written — my <br />understanding is it's quite broad. <br />KD: Who determines what to eradicate and when? I mean basically if you feel <br />that this is one nuisance — OK let's go and just take `em out — that's the <br />whole attitude about it. <br />LM: Yeah. The state — and there are some — obviously there's some statutes <br />and this is what the State's relying on — is the DLNR's management rights <br />and the right to manage wildlife and that's what they're kind of hanging <br />their hat on — is that that permits them to make those kinds of decisions <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.