Laserfiche WebLink
86 <br />iii. Clarification of the motion on the floor: Approval of Tanimoto’s document <br />87 <br />in whole with exemption of item 4 on the second page. Motion died. <br />88 nd <br />iv. Glass motioned to approve document in whole, striking only item 4 on 2 <br />89 <br />page to be sent to the PD asking him to review request. Tanimoto <br />90 <br />volunteered to write the accompanying letter. Hoover clarified that in <br />91 <br />nowhere in the document does it stipulate the final intent of the <br />92 <br />document and requested it be redrafted to be more specific. Glass <br />93 <br />withdrew her motion. Cohen made a motion to table this discussion until <br />94 <br />January meeting. Hoover seconded. All in favor aside from Glass who <br />95 <br />voted against. <br />96 <br /> Sub-Committee Reports. <br />Action Committee reviewed sub-committee reports <br />4. <br />97 <br />and recommended motions and discussion items to place on the next meeting <br />98 <br />agenda for action. <br />99 <br />a. – John Mueller (absent) <br />Waikoloa <br />100 <br />i. <br />Anika Glass led discussion and provided background information regarding a <br />101 <br />number of traffic intersections in the South Kohala district along the Queen <br />102 <br />Kaahumanu Highway near the Waikoloa and Mauna Lani Resorts. She <br />103 <br />requested that the following motion be considered: <br />104 <br />a. The SKCDPAC is to request the Planning Department to research <br />105 <br />original and all subsequent permits for both the Hilton Waikoloa <br />106 <br />Village and Mauna Lani Resorts to determine what their <br />107 <br />responsibilities toward traffic control are for the Queen Kaahumanu <br />108 <br />intersections. To include answers as to what they are responsible for <br />109 <br />and a timeline for compliance. Provide documentation for future <br />110 <br />reference. <br />111 <br />ii. Tanimoto interjected during Glass’ discussion as to whether or not the <br />112 <br />Ainalea project is within all of this and how it is affected. <br />113 <br />a. Glass clarified her motion to acknowledge that Ainalea is supposedly <br />114 <br />exempt and her request only pertains to HWV and MLR. <br />115 <br />iii. Cohen motioned to approve motion for the sake of discussion with <br />116 <br />clarification that the matter is within the scope of the SKCDPAC. Glass <br />117 <br />clarified that she believes it is within the scope of responsibility of the <br />118 <br />SKCDPAC. Tanimoto referred this to the Traffic Safety Committee <br />119 <br />(Gunner) to determine the role of the SKCDPAC in regards to this matter. <br />120 <br />Cohen acknowledged the seriousness of the matter overall and that it <br />121 <br />should be looked into further to determine a best course of action on <br />122 <br />behalf of the SKCDPAC. Tanimoto asked for a second to the motion. All <br />123 <br />opposed, motion died. <br />124 <br />b. - John Hoover – n/a <br />Puako <br />125 <br />c. - Joel Cohen – n/a <br />Waimea <br />126 <br />d. - Roger Harris (absent) <br />District-Wide <br /> <br />