My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2016 10:21:07 AM
Creation date
5/8/2015 10:30:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Board of Appeals <br />October 15, 2014 <br />Ms. Noda replied that it would be the date of when the written decision was issued. <br />If someone came in and said, "Well, I, didn't file within 20 calendar days because I <br />was actually in the hospital for 60 days and nobody checked my mail"—there may <br />be provisions by mutual agreement for the Board to allow continuances or <br />extensions of time for extenuating circumstances, but she would need to review <br />the Rules if it would apply to the filing of an appeal. <br />Ms. Toriano commented that the departments are delegated the authority to write <br />their own internal complaint procedure, so it makes sense that this language is <br />used. When our Department's Rules gets updated and adopted, our intent is to <br />take that authority away from all of the departments and come out with a single <br />County -wide internal complaint procedure. This would probably be the same time <br />that we're going to revisit this appeal form by changing the words "Department of <br />Civil Service" to "Department of Human Resources." <br />Chair Kuewa inquired whether decisions made at levels below this Board are oral or <br />written decisions. <br />Ms. Toriano replied that every department would need to render a written <br />decision, but isn't sure whether it's mailed or hand -delivered personally. Normally, <br />it's 20 days from the date of the decision from the Mayor's office. <br />Ms. Noda wanted to clarify her answer concerning if there were extenuating <br />circumstances that an appellant would have an extension of the 20 calendar day <br />filing deadline. The language "shall be filed within twenty calendar days"—the <br />word "shall" makes it mandatory. She doesn't know whether the Board actually <br />has the authority to do that and will need to look into it further. <br />Chair Kuewa asked if the Board has the authority to change the wording from <br />"twenty days from a decision rendered" to "twenty days from the date the <br />appellant received the decision." <br />Ms. Rabago stated that she's in favor of leaving the language the way it is because <br />there are people who will avoid service of receipt. Mr. Hermes confirmed <br />Ms. Rabago's statement that we can't control when someone receives something, <br />but we can control when we render a decision. It could almost be an indefinite <br />process. <br />Mr. Nahuina inquired whether the appeal's form is available on the internet or <br />strictly from the department only. Mr. Toriano replied that the form is available on <br />the internet <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.