My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2016 10:21:07 AM
Creation date
5/8/2015 10:30:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Board of Appeals <br />October 15, 2014 <br />Ms. Toriano stated that the goals were established based on collaboration with <br />the division heads of the HR Department and, of course, the Merit Appeals Board. <br />There are a lot of items that we'd like to see done. As an example, survey <br />question Number 8 states, "How knowledgeable is Human Resources about your <br />department goals?" (SEE. PREVIOUS ATT. Q. When 1 compared the ratings (2011- <br />2012 and 2013-2014), I'm not thrilled at the result as it looks like we're moving in <br />the wrong direction. How are we going to address this? We have quarterly <br />expectations of our recruitment, classification, and transactions that are going <br />out into the field to visit the worksites and to learn more about the requirements <br />of the positions. <br />Mr. Nahuina mentioned that when he was looking at the comments, about one- <br />fourth of them talked about understanding communication—they would like to <br />see HR talk with them and understand what they're going through. He's glad that <br />she's acknowledging and addressing that issue. <br />Ms. Toriano commented that along that line, there were discrepancies between <br />what one employee would say versus another employee would say in another <br />section. Standardization was put into place and we're hoping to see a more <br />favorable response. <br />Ms. Toriano stated that another goal is updating the Department's Rules, which is <br />still a work -in -progress. <br />Chair Kuewa stated that those were the things that he looked at. From his point <br />of view, he considered them to be under the "communications, campaign, or <br />improvement categories" where she's doing things to improve in all of those <br />areas for communicating with the departments. <br />Mr. Nahuina stated that under "comments" he noticed the issue of time where <br />timeliness was brought up a number of times. He understands that the process <br />takes time, but was there anything that HR was doing to address that part— <br />teamwork, timeliness, streamlining—to understand their needs. <br />Ms. Toriano said that she believes that this may have been predicated on a <br />process change made to the hiring and recruiting where we have a County -wide <br />policy that sets one process for all departments. It does involve more steps and <br />oversight of leadership, which does take more time. We also have oversight at <br />each step in the recruitment process—how we're going to fill the position and <br />who are we recommending for hire. This process was requested by our <br />leadership and it was developed to meet that need. <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.