My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-10-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2016 10:21:07 AM
Creation date
5/8/2015 10:30:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Board of Appeals <br />October 15, 2014 <br />Chair Kuewa asked Ms. Toriano whether she has any suggestions for <br />improvement—what's working and what's not working. <br />Ms. Toriano replied that their department has been very specialized in the <br />assignments that they perform. Making a difference for the various departments <br />requires our staff to become better -rounded to address questions, whether it is <br />transactions, classification, recruitment, and examination. Previously, if someone <br />called this office, they would be referred to the respective section. If that person <br />wasn't available to assist them, they would need to wait until that person <br />returned. <br />Ms. Toriano added that they have pretty much gone through the cross -training, <br />which was started with a blueprint where it's totally flexible and it's still a <br />work -in -progress. She gives the greatest amount of credit to Nick as he worked <br />with them, held their hand, tweaked that blueprint when it required tweaking— <br />and he's gained the support of all of them to say that they can do this and that it <br />makes more sense now. We still need to finish this process because not all of the <br />"specialists" have graduated to become a "generalist" in our processing center. <br />This concerns timeliness and how we can improve. <br />Mr. Hermes explained that, previously, they would have sections that would do <br />certain things. For instance, when someone wants to reorganize their division, <br />they would talk to a certain section. When that's completed, then they would <br />want to fill some of those vacancies—and they'd talk to another section. Then, <br />those people will need to be hired and paid—and they talk to another section He <br />further explained that it was just a task for before them, and the sections were <br />just doing it and no one was necessarily in the loop or discussing it. Inherently, <br />the customer service element and the communications were hindered because of <br />how our workflow was set-up. <br />Mr. Hermes stated that we're on our way in what we're trying to achieve. As an <br />example, if Chair Jube was an employee in our department, we'll tell you that in <br />these functional areas, you will support these certain three departments. Almost <br />immediately we saw re -growth in that personal connection. Our employees are <br />more vested in a smaller group of customers (departments). Those customers <br />come to rely on one person through the continuum of tasks, and they're all in the <br />same loop. The have the opportunity to get to know each other and how they <br />each think. This is something we've never had before. I think we're reaching this <br />point where we're about to take off. This is something new. We have a sampling <br />in the field, where the departments really like it. <br />Chair Kuewa commented that this is a team of all the different specialties <br />servicing those departments, and each team is an entity. <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.