My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-COH - County Clerk and Elections Agreed Upon Procedures Report
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2014-COH - County Clerk and Elections Agreed Upon Procedures Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 10:18:29 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:15:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County of Hawaii — Office of County Clerk and Office of Elections <br />Agreed Upon Procedures Report <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Recommendation: Original signed timesheets should be filed immediately after <br />they are returned from the payroll department. <br />iv. Condition: There were no overtime descriptions on seven timesheets or <br />timesheet attachments. (See Exhibit A: Agree Overtime Exception d). <br />Recommendation: Timesheets should include adequate descriptions for <br />overtime hours. <br />v. Condition: On October 2, 2012 the State of Hawai'i Office of Elections <br />rescinded its prior delegation of the State of Hawai'i's responsibilities to the <br />County of Hawai'i for the 2012 General Election. (See Exhibit A: Agree Overtime <br />Exception e). <br />Recommendation: Communication between management and staff should be <br />improved to prevent unnecessary overtime. <br />b. We compared the 2012, 2010 and 2008 election cycle salaries and wages and identified <br />all variances by COH general ledger account classification for each election cycle. The <br />comparison is attached to this report as Exhibit B. <br />c. We compared the 2012, 2010, and 2008 election cycle salaries and wages to the budget <br />and identified all variances by COH general ledger account classification. The <br />comparison is attached to this report as Exhibit C. <br />COH Elections Division Non -payroll Expenditures: <br />a. We vouched all Election Division non -payroll expenditures for the 2012 election cycle to <br />source documents and proper authorization. The Election Division recorded 753 non - <br />payroll expenditure transactions during the 2012 election cycle. The supporting source <br />documents were located in the Election Division files for 467 transactions, in the Finance <br />Department for 260 transactions, and were unattainable for 26 transactions. Of the 753 <br />non -payroll transactions, 626 were vouched to source documentation with proper <br />authorization without exception. The remaining 127 transactions with exceptions are <br />reported in Exhibit D attached to this report. Our findings and recommendations are as <br />follows: <br />Condition: There were 16 P -card purchases with no supporting documents <br />other than the First Hawaiian Bank Account Activity Statement. These charges <br />totaled $642.26 and ranged from $4.07 to $112.07. (See Exhibit D, Vouch <br />exception VA). There were 10 P -card purchases where the submitted <br />supporting document was not the actual invoice. These purchases amounted to <br />$793.13 and ranged from $32.42 to $202.19. In 7 of the P -card purchases, the <br />expenditure was for the rental of a car and the submitted document was the <br />rental company's estimate of charges provided at the time the car was picked up. <br />(See Exhibit D, Vouch exception V.5). <br />Recommendation: We recommend that the Election Division comply with the <br />Legislative Branch Spending Guidelines for P -card purchases which requires that <br />itemized receipts, detailing what was purchased and the purpose, are submitted <br />with monthly purchase reports. <br />Condition: There were 46 description discrepancies between the Eden Financial <br />Management Solution's (Eden) Detail Expenditure Report's Full Invoice Line <br />Description and the invoice (See Exhibit D exception V.1). There was one <br />$588.04 hotel charge that included a day that was not on the travel certificate. <br />The County paid for an additional night in the approximate amount of $147.01 for <br />an employee that returned to Hilo on that day. Management was unable to <br />determine if the additional night's charge was due to poor communication, or a <br />forfeiture due to a last-minute change in the employee's itinerary. There was <br />also a travel certificate that was improperly revised by the reviewer resulting in a <br />per diem overpayment of $40. The other 44 discrepancies appear to be human <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.