My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-COH - County Clerk and Elections Agreed Upon Procedures Report
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2014-COH - County Clerk and Elections Agreed Upon Procedures Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2015 10:18:29 AM
Creation date
6/16/2015 10:15:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County of Hawaii — Office of County Clerk and Office of Elections <br />Agreed Upon Procedures Report <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />error including misuse of pro forma and key punch error. However, there was no <br />dollar effect of these discrepancies. <br />Recommendation: We recommend that differences between the recorded <br />amounts and the supporting travel certificate be adequately explained and <br />approved. Account clerks should exercise greater care when entering <br />information into the Eden report. <br />iii. Condition: There were 30 travel expenditures that did not have an approved <br />certificate of travel (See Exhibit D exception A.3). The Eden invoice line item <br />description stated that these expenditures were for Election Division related <br />travel. There were also 21 travel expenditures with certificates of travel <br />authorized and submitted after the expiration of the 30 -day travel report filing <br />period as outlined in the Administrative Manual of the Hawaii Council and Office <br />of the County Clerk (See Exhibit D exception A.5). The certificates of travel were <br />created in January 2013 for Election Division related travel during calendar year <br />2012. <br />Recommendation: We recommend that Election Division employees abide by <br />the guidelines and submit certificates of travel within the filing period. <br />iv. Condition: There were 36 expenditures that included a notable comment in the <br />Invoice History Approval queue (See Exhibit D exception A.1). In 34 cases, the <br />Finance Department was forced to pay the First Hawaiian Bank credit card <br />transactions without having the supporting documents because the credit card <br />payment was due. Subsequent to payment, the Finance Department received <br />the supporting documents for 23 of these transactions; the supporting documents <br />were not provided for 10 of these transactions (see exception VA in Condition i); <br />and the supporting document was not the actual invoice for one transaction (see <br />exception V.5 in Condition i). In 2 cases the comment in the Invoice History <br />Approval queue were reminders to the Election Division that the Purchasing <br />Department must be informed when transactions are over $1,000, these <br />transactions were authorized because the invoice was due. <br />Recommendation: We recommend that Election Division employees abide by <br />County procedures by retaining the original supporting documents for submittal <br />to the Finance Department, and by informing the Purchasing Department when <br />transactions exceed $1,000. <br />v. Condition: There were 23 transactions incorrectly recorded in the <br />Travel/Conference Account totaling $3,979.32. There were 16 transactions <br />totaling $3,361.79 that should have been recorded in the Meal Provision <br />Account. There was a transaction for $249.96 that should have been recorded in <br />Office Equipment Account. There were 4 transactions totaling $260.53 that <br />should have been recorded in the Fuel Account. There were two transactions <br />totaling $107.04 that should have been recorded in the Misc. Account. <br />Recommendation: We recommend that transactions are recorded in the proper <br />account. <br />vi. Condition: There were two Charter Amendment advertising transactions totaling <br />$7,729.18 (see Exhibit D exception A.6). Based on our review of the supporting <br />documentation and further confirmation with management, these items should <br />have been recorded in the Office of the County Clerk Advertising Account. <br />Recommendation: We recommend that transactions are recorded in the proper <br />account. <br />We compared the 2012, 2010, and 2008 election cycle non -payroll expenditures and <br />identified all variances by COH general ledger account classification. The comparison is <br />attached to this report as Exhibit E. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.