Laserfiche WebLink
PATEL: So, next the Commission needs to decide whether or not they want to refer the matter <br />to a hearings officer or for the Commission or any composition of the Commission to act as <br />hearings officer themselves. And, a motion would need to be made for action on that issue. <br /> <br />MOSES: Do we have a motion, Commissioners? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: I’m sorry, I should have addressed this in executive session but maybe it’s not <br />necessary. Are we under any time frames or time deadlines? <br /> <br />PATEL: Time deadlines with respect to? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Contested case hearings. I’m just thinking about scheduling. <br /> <br />PATEL: Through completion of the contested case hearing? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Or to even to initiate. <br /> <br />PATEL: Oh, so to begin. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Yes. <br /> <br />PATEL: No, that can be by agreement of the parties really, but practically you want it sooner <br />than later. Thirty days would be reasonable to at least you know set some deadlines for <br />submission of documents and what not. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Then I would move that the Commission as a whole act as hearing officer in <br />this matter. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Second. <br /> <br />MOSES: It has been—a motion has been made by Commissioner Heaukulani and seconded by <br />Commissioner Ikeda. Discussion. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Would it be possible to amend the motion to be worded that Commissioners that <br />agree to serve would be—not a blanket. <br /> <br />PATEL: You may make that motion. So, if you want to amend that motion, you can move to <br />amend. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Is that okay with you? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: You know, I mean for me, it’s more of a scheduling than anything else, yeah. <br /> <br />HENKEL: I can’t amend another motion, right? <br /> <br /> <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />