2015-06-04 HearingTranscript - Arrow of Oregon Amend SPP09-076

Home

MOSES: You can make a motion. PATEL: You can make a motion to amend and then you can vote. HENKEL: Okay, I move that the motion be amended to have the wording be that it be subject to individual, you know, okay from the Commissioners. IKEDA: I’ll second that. PATEL: So, just to clarify, the motion is that the Commission as a whole act as the hearings officer subject to individual Commissioners accepting— HENKEL: --yes— PATEL: --that role. HENKEL: Thank you. PATEL: Which means, which would mean that if any Commissioner does not accept that role, the remaining Commissioners would act as hearing officers. HENKEL: Correct. MOSES: That motion was made by Commissioner Henkel and seconded by Commissioner Ikeda. Discussion? So, I just want to point out I think that to one of the things that we discussed is that taking this on as Commissioners to act as hearing officers, you are committing to attending every meeting that is scheduled for this hearing through the duration of it, and completing it. Correct? Everybody understands that. Yes? Will it be at this time that we make the decision of who will be there or commit to that, Danny? Do we have to make that determination here now? PATEL: I think maybe—does, would staff have any input as to the procedural aspects of proceeding this way? No? DARROW: Staff would work with a representative of the Planning Commission in, in putting together a schedule, and then once the schedule is set, and the parties agree, then we can work through that schedule. Is that what you’re asking? As far as procedure? PATEL: Yeah, if—if you had any comments generally. Okay, so I think we’re all on the same page unless there are any questions? Okay. MOSES: Any further discussion? If not, let’s call for the vote. DARROW: Okay, my understanding is we’re gonna take the amendment vote first, okay? And just so I’m clear, I’m gonna try to reiterate that motion. The motion is to amend the main motion 18 EXHIBIT B