Laserfiche WebLink
HENKEL: Okay, and I, you know, I do believe that the HOVE RMC has standing in this, and I <br />hope this is an incentive for both parties to quickly, you know, work it out, and the sooner, the <br />better for everybody so-- <br /> <br />DARROW: Question? <br /> <br />MOSES: Yes, Jeff. <br /> <br />DARROW: Just a question for Commissioner Henkel. Would you like to include the same type <br />of wording regarding the last motion? <br /> <br />HENKEL: Yes. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay. So, each Commissioner would have an opportunity to—thank you. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Yeah, thank you for bring that up. <br /> <br />MOSES: Any further discussion, Commissioners? If not, call for vote. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay, just for clarification, second was Commissioner— <br /> <br />MOSES: --Heaukulani. <br /> <br />DARROW: --Heaukulani. Thank you. So, just to reiterate, the motion before us is to grant <br />standing to the petitioner, HOVE Road Maintenance Corp. with the understanding that each <br />Commissioner has the opportunity to accept or decline being a part of the contested case. <br />Agree? <br /> <br />PATEL: I think we need to handle that separately. <br /> <br />DARROW: Oh. <br /> <br />PATEL: First, we need to figure out if granting is going to be, I mean standing is going to be <br />granted. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay. <br /> <br />PATEL: Then we can have a separate motion. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay, separate motion. Okay, so the motion before us is to grant standing. Okay, <br />with that, we’ll take the roll call. Commissioner Henkel? <br /> <br />HENKEL: Aye. <br /> <br />DARROW: Commissioner Heaukulani? <br /> <br />7 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />