My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-09-09 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2015
>
2015-09-09 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2016 8:14:17 AM
Creation date
3/8/2016 3:14:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
office." So again thank you for the opportunity to respond this <br /> petition and I will answer any questions that you may have. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you. Do we have any questions? <br /> Mr. Adams: Of course I do. Thanks to both of you for being here today. If I <br /> could ask Chair Kanuha, the leadership award could you give me a <br /> little more detail. What was the leadership award? <br /> Mr. Kanuha: So they gave me a Legislator of the Year you know. They <br /> presented me a Legislator of the Year and at that stakeholders <br /> meeting I got the opportunity to talk in front of pretty much a room <br /> full of stakeholders and Department of Health, a lot of health <br /> service industry professionals. And my reason for being there was <br /> to explain what we were doing in pursuit of healthy communities <br /> in Hawai`i County. And they wanted me to explain the bills that <br /> we were passing, the Mayor's initiatives, healthy initiatives here in <br /> Hawai`i County and what we were trying to do to pursue a <br /> healthier community and that was the reason for me being there. <br /> Mr. Adams: Thank you. In your letter to the Board, you specifically talked to <br /> the various sections of the County Code and let me just bring us to <br /> 2-91.4 which is the gift provision. In the gift provision itself, I'll <br /> put it on the record. "No officer or employee shall solicit, accept, <br /> or receive, directly or indirectly, any gift, whether in the form of <br /> money, service, loan, travel, entertainment, hospitality, thing, or <br /> promise or in any other form, under circumstances in which it can <br /> be reasonably be inferred that the gift is intended to influence the <br /> officer or employee in the performance of the officer's or <br /> employee's official duties or is intended as a reward for any <br /> official action on the officer's or employee's part." I'm troubled by <br /> the acceptance of the travel when I take a look at the phrasing in 2- <br /> 91.4. Specifically, I'm troubled because I think you've identified <br /> that at face value the formulation of the bill was accomplished <br /> prior to the identification and the offer of attending to receive the <br /> award of Legislator of the Year and that's great, that's facts. But <br /> when we take a look at this section, it's not the facts of the <br /> formulation that are relevant. Right. It's the perception that's <br /> relevant and so the reason I'm troubled is because I think that it's <br /> reasonable to infer that the gift of the travel could have been <br /> intended to influence. It doesn't matter whether it did or didn't, it <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.