My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-10 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-02-10 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 3:15:21 PM
Creation date
3/8/2016 3:15:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on the agenda. We decided to continue that conversation, but this <br /> issue, his request for a motion to reconsideration is not one of <br /> those items that was at the last meeting. So I'm a little troubled <br /> that we're actually continuing to have a conversation on <br /> correspondence. Actually. If these things are going to be <br /> agendized at the next meeting, then that's the proper venue for us <br /> to talk about these in substance. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: But basically, I mean Mr. Hyland cannot make a motion to <br /> reconsider for; I mean it would be one of us could make a motion <br /> to reconsider. <br /> Mr. Murai: Under a very limited or narrow circumstances. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Right. If we met all the procedural requirements we could, but he <br /> can't. As far as the Kenoi matter, right I mean the attorneys aren't <br /> here. Of course it's not on our agenda so we shouldn't talk about <br /> it. I agree with Mr. Adams about that, but I just wanted to make it <br /> clear. That we were waiting for Mr. Hyland to notify us that we <br /> should put it on, to request that we re-agendize that letter. <br /> Mr. Murai: Mr. Chair, my recollection is that there were pending matters. Mr. <br /> Hyland was not able to attend that meeting because of an injury. <br /> So what the Board did was continued that matter until it was <br /> moved on and Mr. Hyland was instructed to notify us when he was <br /> well enough to resume the petition as a whole. The Board would <br /> then put it back on the calendar, provide notice to other side and <br /> anyways that's where we left off. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Thank you. That makes sense to me. Mr. Hyland did you get that. <br /> I mean. Did you understand? <br /> Mr. Hyland: I did. I do hear that and I'm sorry I wasn't left with the impression <br /> that I had an obligation. I don't believe I was notified that I had an <br /> obligation to do anything or least if I was, I apologize again <br /> because I don't recall it. But I'm more than, I can live with that <br /> very easily. I'm very happy to do that. I can submit as just as the <br /> item 03. I can submit a formal, written motion for reconsideration <br /> with all the specific why I would like it to be reconsidered. But <br /> basically, my appeal today was motioning for reconsideration on <br /> all three of them simply because you now have two new voices <br /> that can participate in that conversation. I'll certainly as the item <br /> number three, now that I understand that the balls in my court as it <br /> were. I'll certainly write a formal letter to the Board. Hopefully in <br /> the next few days. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.