My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Milo Street Ventures SLU 15-045 REZ 15-197
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Milo Street Ventures SLU 15-045 REZ 15-197
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2016 1:56:31 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 1:56:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />NISHIMURA: That’s correct. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Can I get staff to I guess give us the position of the Department in your basis <br />for Condition of Approval G, Jeff? <br /> <br />DARROW: Sure, thank you, Mr. Chairman. When an applicant comes before the Planning <br />Commission and the Council to request a Change of Zone to a higher density type zoning, we <br />take into consideration infrastructure improvements that would be needed that would be able to <br />handle the additional high density of that particular zoning. There are standards, roadway <br />standards, for Industrial zoning. We’re just simply reflecting those. <br /> <br />If I can defer, refer you to our memorandum received from the Department of Public Works <br />which is our Exhibit No. 4, they’re asking for the properties’ frontage to be improved with <br />pavement widening with curb, gutter, and sidewalk and drainage improvements, so they wanted <br />actually a higher standard for this particular application. And, not only this one, but others as <br />well on Milo Street. <br /> <br />In the past, understanding this unique situation of the privately owned road by Shipman and the <br />circumstances that it puts on the applicants to improve to these standards, we’ve, we’ve actually <br />recommended that it be brought down to a lesser standard which is the paved swales, and that <br />would be in our Exhibit No. 3. It kind of gives you an indication of the two different standards <br />that we look at. <br /> <br />Industrial zoning does call for a 60-foot wide right-of-way, which at this time, as mentioned, it’s <br />approximately 40 feet. So, as well as the applicant across the street which came in, in 2004, they <br />were required to do a future road widening setback and improvement similar to this application <br />of ten feet. And, so we’re just asking for the same thing. <br /> <br />In talking with the County, you know, the process is for the County to accept the roadway for <br />dedication, the road has to be built to dedicable standards. Unless the County builds it, they’re <br />not going to come in and build it and then, and then take it over. It has to be built to dedicable <br />standards. So, it doesn’t seem very likely that in the near future, or far future actually, that this <br />road is going to be built to dedicable standards by any other than either Shipman, the landowner <br />of the private roadway, and/or the applicants that own properties along the roadway. <br /> <br />So, again, with—with the request of the higher use, there comes infrastructure considerations <br />that have to be met. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Thank you, Jeff. Commissioners, any questions for—I’ll leave it open—for <br />either the Applicant or for staff on this matter? <br /> <br />IKEDA: Mr. Chairman? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Commissioner Ikeda. <br /> <br />6 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.