My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-08 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-03-08 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2016 2:39:01 PM
Creation date
4/13/2016 3:44:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Goodenow and so that would be I think the answer from <br /> Mr. Goodenow. If we view that as such, then the way that <br /> we're supposed to proceed according to the rules. Is the <br /> remaining Board members shall decide whether or not that <br /> Board member should be disqualified from proceeding <br /> therein? So that's a vote that we would handle. Mr. <br /> Goodenow is not the only one that's listed Madame Chair <br /> and so I'm a little bit at a lost because I'm not sure how we <br /> handle that. <br /> Mr. Robinson: If I could from an administrative stand point. It's <br /> unfortunate that the petition covered two, it should have <br /> been one petition for each. But I think if we bifurcate this <br /> petition and deal with each one separately, that we could <br /> proceed. I'd prefer to do it that way. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: And I have to apologize. I was under the impression that <br /> an oral statement would be sufficient in this case. The way <br /> I read it, I thought an oral statement would be sufficient and <br /> I'm prepared to make an oral statement in regards to this <br /> matter. <br /> Mr. Adams: That would be great. The only other thing that I would <br /> before we would move on with that. The only other thing I <br /> would note is that the...on the matter that we had 2015-10 I <br /> believe that Mr. Revell whose the petitioner in this <br /> particular 2015-15. I think he was referring to this <br /> complaint as well when he was asking for continuation. So <br /> I would just raise that. It doesn't mean that we have to, I <br /> would just note that he did ask for that. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Is that how Counsel interpreted it, the request for <br /> continuation? <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Yes. I took as he's requesting all matters pertaining to <br /> what he has before the Board, he wanted it continued <br /> because I think in the email he stated his perception or <br /> belief as to how things might transpire today. So that is a <br /> concern, he has been here whenever the matter has brought <br /> up except for today. So that should be considered by the <br /> Board. Your discretion. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Anybody...would it make sense for me to do an <br /> oral...addressing this matter orally at this point in time <br /> make any sense or should we wait then for that as well? <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.