My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-12 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-04-12 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2016 2:13:48 PM
Creation date
5/10/2016 2:13:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Andrade: Yes. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: So in that sense, I mean that is...your job right. I don't <br /> think in my opinion and I'm willing to discuss this further. <br /> As far as fair treatment provision right, if you're doing <br /> something...you can design something that you know can <br /> or something like that. That could be an issue, but outside <br /> of the parks department I certainly don't see a problem. <br /> Anyway that's my thoughts on this. <br /> Mr. Adams: Madame Chair. I think the first thing I would say about <br /> this is this is really facts specific. Our ability to address <br /> your...where a conflict of interest might come...becomes <br /> one that is based on the facts of the contract. Where you <br /> are in the County, the connection between your position <br /> and what the contracts gonna be doing. Those are all things <br /> that you take into consideration. So I'll say that. I think <br /> there's...under the current law, not the Code that's coming <br /> in one July. When we look at 2-83(b) it talks about "No <br /> officer or employee shall use or attempt to use the officer's <br /> or employee's official position to secure or grant <br /> unwarranted privileges, exemptions, advantages, contracts, <br /> or treatment, for oneself or others". And that "includes and <br /> not limited to seeking other employment or contract for <br /> services for oneself by the use or attempted use of the <br /> officer's or employee's office or position". So I think that <br /> this Board over the years to the extent that I'm aware what <br /> the Board has done. Has taken a pretty liberal position on <br /> that and liberal and meaning expansive. That if you are in <br /> a position that oversees the execution of contracts and also <br /> potentially bidding on a contract for that particular agency. <br /> That would be considered a conflict of interest. So, but you <br /> know we're just having a discussion here and different <br /> members of the Board may have different views on that. <br /> For me, the idea is to try and create some type of firewall <br /> between what your position is with the County, the <br /> responsibilities you have and what the contracts is for. <br /> Typically we can do that by ensuring that you're not <br /> engaged in...that someone's not engaged in a contract for <br /> the agency that you're a member of or only in another <br /> agency. That's a potential firewall. Again it comes back to <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.