My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-12 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-04-12 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2016 2:13:48 PM
Creation date
5/10/2016 2:13:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also perception and trusting government and how those <br /> things look not just how they would be if you follow my <br /> drift. I'm concerned about...personally I'm concerned <br /> about addressing this petition in the hypothetical because <br /> it's such a broad hypothetical for me. And so I'm inclined <br /> to suggest that we dismiss it just because I don't know we <br /> do anybody any good by answering a question that is as <br /> broad as this. But I'm also open to other thoughts on this. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Madame Chair. I'm sorry I'm remiss. I have the current <br /> code, I don't have the updated provision of July 1. At the <br /> last meeting we actually did take a position that was <br /> prospective and I don't know if that established a <br /> precedent. If we want to discuss that issue. <br /> Mr. Adams: Madame Chair if I might. I think that what we did last time <br /> actually had to do with a facts specific situation. And then <br /> the way the current...the law that takes effect on July 1. <br /> What it changes is not specifically the 2-84 aspect of this. <br /> Meaning 2-84(a) doesn't change and the portion that we <br /> were looking at in 2-83 doesn't change at least the item that <br /> I was referring to. The part that does change...it does say <br /> that if there was going to be a contracting for goods and <br /> services within a County agency. Then that officer or <br /> employee needs to obtain an opinion from the Board that <br /> there's no conflict of interest. That maybe why Mr. <br /> Andrade's coming to us now is that he's seeing that and <br /> he's trying to figure out you know...where does that...what <br /> does that take place...when do I need to worry about <br /> coming to the Board prior to doing the bid or when the bids <br /> actually been granted. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Right, because the language is in the event an opinion by <br /> the Board was not obtained in advance of submitting a bid. <br /> The officer or employee shall instead submit a copy of a <br /> letter or petition request in review by the Board. But it <br /> does contemplate this kind of before the bid process you <br /> get some kind of clearance letter. I agree with you, I mean <br /> if you had like you're gonna bid for something you know <br /> what it is, you come to us and say hey I want to bid for <br /> project x. Is that a problem? I can understand that means <br /> you gotta come to the Board for every single...I don't <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.