My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-05 Hearing Transcript - PD Initiated Puna Pono Alliance et al Presentation by Claims Adjuster
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-05-05 Hearing Transcript - PD Initiated Puna Pono Alliance et al Presentation by Claims Adjuster
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2016 3:09:00 PM
Creation date
6/2/2016 3:08:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HENKEL: Mr. Chair? <br />HEAUKULANL I'm sorry, go ahead, Commissioner Henkel, please. <br />HENKEL: I have a question. I was wondering if the John Mullen Company was paid for this <br />recommendation and if so, how much? <br />OWENS: I have no idea what the pricing is, but we are hired as the adjuster. <br />HENKEL: Is this something that the Planning Department could help me out with? <br />ARAI: I do have that information. I just don't have it readily at hand. It's in a separate file, but <br />I can go get that information for you right away. <br />HENKEL: Thank you. <br />HEAUKULANL Any other questions? Commissioner Ikeda. <br />IKEDA: So, you know, the Commission had kind of approved the, the study, and according to <br />your letter, I guess the claimant could not qualify for, under Rule 12. Can you explain a little <br />more? <br />OWENS: Yeah, as this is down there—there are the various requirements under Rule 12 from <br />which the claim adjuster has to find if there is a recommendation for acceptance of a claim. <br />Previous claims that have been handled have been fairly liberal on what's coming through. So, <br />it's not a very strict adherence as long as it's, I guess we would call it, close enough. If it looks <br />like a chicken and it can quack even though a chicken won't quack, if it looks like a chicken, <br />good enough. <br />When it comes down based on the rules, we don't have enough of them that fit into the <br />requirements to do a recommendation, and there was so many that didn't fit that it had to come <br />up as a denial that would go through. One of the main things is this is for Puna, and the <br />Edelstein report was commenting on the Big Island. And while it's readily acknowledged that it <br />may well affect the entire Big Island, the rule is for Puna residents only, and it's for the majority <br />of the Puna residents, so whatever the particular subgroup is, which is having the claim, they <br />must be in Puna. <br />IKEDA: Is there anyway where the Alliance can somehow get together with you so they can get <br />closer. You know, I think their, I thinkI think their intent is good but somehow— <br />OWENS: —Yeah, their <br />IKEDA: —the language is not correct. <br />OWENS: Correct. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.