My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
HAMAKUA CDP MEMO v4 - redacted
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Public Comment/Feedback on Draft Hamakua CDP
>
HAMAKUA CDP MEMO v4 - redacted
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 2:08:47 PM
Creation date
6/22/2016 2:08:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Use Commission by the County, shall only apply to County parcels when the Land Use <br />Commission has made a final decision to include such parcels as IAL and when the LUC <br />approves of any County policies or regulations that purport to implement the State IAL uses, <br />policies or regulations. In the meantime all land use for agricultural parcels shall be governed <br />by the zoning code". <br />*A separate planning track should be launched by Hawaii County to study IAL only. <br />*The County should create and frequently update a separate website to educate the public <br />about the IAL process that will lead to the submittal of parcels to the LUC; and how the IAL <br />differs from the agricultural policies and goals in the CDP and the General Plan. <br />*How would existing development of agricultural parcels be "preserved" for agriculture and <br />open space? And how will this policy affect the re -building of destroyed or damaged <br />structures on parcels that are currently developed with residential homes and other non- <br />agricultural structures? There should be a provision in the CDP that allows any loss of <br />grandfathered non-agricultural structure to be repaired, rebuilt, and used in a pre -IAL manner <br />in perpetuity which runs with the land. <br />*ISSUE 3: The General Plan also adopts criteria for important agricultural lands modeled on <br />State law that apparently refers to County (LUPAG) IAL which is supposed to be limited to <br />"zoning". These General Plan criteria refer to State IAL which further confuses County IAL with <br />State IAL. The General Plan use of State IAL criteria cannot be binding since there is no State <br />IAL in the County of Hawaii except those IAL by virtue of a 205-45 Petition (if any) which also is <br />under State jurisdiction. <br />For instance, <br />■the 2005 General Plan states at page 14-8: Important Agricultural Land: Important <br />agricultural lands are those with better potential for sustained high agricultural yields because <br />of soil type, climate, topography, or other factors <br />■compare to State HRS 205-42 "Important agricultural lands" means those lands... that... Are <br />capable of producing sustained high agricultural yields...." <br />■County: Important agricultural lands were determined by including the following lands: <br />■compare to State HRS 205-44 Standards and criteria for the identification of important <br />agricultural lands <br />■County: Lands identified in the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii <br />(ALISH) classification system as "Prime" or "Unique". <br />■compare to State: HRS 205-44 c-3: Land identified under agricultural production rating <br />systems, such as the agricultural lands of importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) system <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.