My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-07-12 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-07-12 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2016 1:43:41 PM
Creation date
8/9/2016 1:43:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Kahakalau: So we will go...did you have a comment? Any discussion? <br /> Motion and Vote: Mr. Goodenow moved to go into executive session. Ms. Kalele <br /> seconded the motion. All members vote aye. <br /> 10:48 a.m. The Board left regular session. <br /> * <br /> 11: 33 a.m. The Board returned from executive session. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Okay. So we're back in session and we have a motion for approval <br /> and a second for approval of Petition No. 2016-06. Do we have <br /> any additional discussion? <br /> Mr. Adams: Yes. Madame Chair if I might. For the purposes of discussion. <br /> Our understanding of...let me re-phrase that. My understanding of <br /> the new ordinance is that it refers specifically to invitations for <br /> bids and request for proposals. That there are other methods of <br /> procurement within the County procurement system that this <br /> particular 2-83(c) is not specifically talking about. There are other <br /> elements of the County Ethics Code when we're talking about <br /> potential conflict of interest that do address those, but that "c" is <br /> not specifically associated with that. Your petition as I understand <br /> it is related specifically to professional services. The desire to <br /> place yourself on professional service list associated with these <br /> other departments other than the department of planning. Is that <br /> accurate? <br /> Mr. Gloor: That's correct. <br /> Mr. Adams: And so given that...it would be my intention to support this motion <br /> with that understanding that we're talking about this narrow fact <br /> pattern and my understanding of the new ordinances impact on <br /> your fact pattern. I should also say that in relation to the other <br /> elements of the Code that for me the fact that there is a firewall <br /> element here that when you answered the question from Vice- <br /> Chair Goodenow about your...meaning Ms. Gloor. Your <br /> involvement as County Planner with these other departments that <br /> there's a timing piece to that when you're involved and that the <br /> involvement then of Mr. Gloor in your involvement as a consultant <br /> or as a sub-contractor at some point. Let me not mess that up just <br /> as a contractor consultant would be at a different timing...there <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.