Laserfiche WebLink
Motion and Vote: Mr. Goodenow moved to accept Mr. Ilagan's gift disclosure statement. <br /> Mr. Robinson seconded the motion. All members vote aye. <br /> b. Petition No. 2016-06: Request for an informal advisory opinion from a <br /> spouse of a County officer or employee, to determine whether there would be <br /> any conflict of interest with him being able to bid for County of Hawaii <br /> projects excluding the department in which is wife is employed by. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Is the petitioner present? Alright. You have a right to request a <br /> closed hearing...would you like a closed hearing? No. Alright. If <br /> you could please state your name and let us know a little bit <br /> more...anything you want to emphasis in addition to the petition. <br /> Ms. Gloor: Okay. My name is Leana Gloor. I work for the Planning <br /> Department, Long Range Division. I've worked there since May <br /> 2015 and previous to that I was in a business with my husband as a <br /> planner and he's a civil engineer. But when I started working May <br /> 2015...I'm not taking...not actively taking planning jobs. He is <br /> still continuing with his engineering and so this comes up now <br /> with the new rule. As whether he can continue to...primarily he's <br /> been a sub-contractor for different contracts with the County, but <br /> he may at some time be a lead or seek to be a lead entering projects <br /> for civil engineering. So we just wanted an interpretation that <br /> this...whether this was a conflict. He does not take or has not <br /> soliciting contract for the Planning Department. It would be other <br /> departments. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Do you have any questions? <br /> Mr. Adams: Just so that I understand...in the petition it appeared to me that this <br /> was a question about a general applicability. Meaning there's not a <br /> specific contract that you're looking at right now that you are <br /> making this petition about. Is that right? <br /> Mr. Gloor: That's correct. <br /> Mr. Adams: Thank you. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Alright. Do we have a motion in regards to this petition? <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I have a question for Corp. Counsel. So we are now...it is after <br /> July 1 correct and so we're under the new code language. And <br /> under that language...correct me if I'm wrong,but does that <br /> 6 <br />