My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-07-12 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-07-12 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2016 1:43:41 PM
Creation date
8/9/2016 1:43:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
require someone if for a specific contract when they come up...to <br /> have to come to our body. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: In terms of a specific contract...yes. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: So even though we yes to them now...ifhe does go outside...so <br /> not he...Mr. Gloor. If Mr. Gloor were to go out and submit a bid, <br /> he would have to come back anyway? <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: That depends on what the Board decides here today...because in <br /> the past as I recall the Board when someone asked a general <br /> questions...the Board said come back and see us when you have a <br /> specific question to ask. I'm paraphrasing, but that's essentially <br /> what happened and so I...Mr. Adams if you want... <br /> Mr. Adams: We're having a discussion without a motion. So I would like to be <br /> able to have this discussion within the motion. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Yes. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Alright. <br /> Mr. Robinson: I'd like to make a motion to approve as no finding of conflict. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I'll second that motion. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: Okay. <br /> Mr. Adams: That's exactly my question...that's why I asked a specific question <br /> that I did because this is a request for a blanket approval <br /> essentially. And my reading...my reading of the new ordinance <br /> and how it fits into the code. I'm not sure that is what it says to <br /> me...I think it says more specific contract is what it ask for. <br /> Believe me...I'm not sure I'm happy about that, but I think that's <br /> what it says. And so the ability to take in for example here what <br /> the Gloor's are asking us to do to be able to give an approval on a <br /> request for general applicability. I find that hard given the wording <br /> of the ordinance. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Ms. Gloor. <br /> Ms. Gloor: When I took the Ethics training from Counsel, part of that question <br /> that was raised in that...is one of the things (inaudible)...beyond <br /> the professional services and it's not clear what way <br /> (inaudible)..(microph.one not turned on during testimony) <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.