Laserfiche WebLink
SHIMAOKA: I’ve got one. I just have a concern because I’ve lived here for several years and <br />understand the traffic on Ali‘i Drive, and probably this is going to be to our Director here. Has <br />there any study been made as far as just kind of like periodically checking the traffic and just the <br />hazards or the amount of traffic that is going to cause time constrains or safety? Is the County <br />involved in any kind of ongoing, because, I know because of the parkway not being built, I <br />mean, I agree with the, it would be good to have a four-lane so that we can at least have more <br />safe conditions on Ali‘i Drive. Because driving, especially during Ironman, yeah, I remember <br />that, I was a police officer, that was really a nightmare, yeah, Ali‘i Drive, so. <br /> <br />BRILHANTE: Thank you, Commissioner Shimaoka. I think I’m going to allow the Director to <br />give information as it relates to there’s been any updated traffic studies, but again, I just want to <br />reiterate this is a 19-unit project, you know, that the project was fully vetted in 2006 when the <br />application first came forward. This is an SMA application. The basis of SMA application is the <br />impacts of the project as it relates to the ocean and the coastline and the shoreline. The items <br />with, related to a TIAR or traffic study would be more analogous to under requirements for <br />Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement, and those items were vetted, you know, upon <br />the submission of the original application as well. But, you know, that being said, I’ll allow the <br />Director to provide any additional information as to whether or not there are any update reports <br />to those traffic analysis. <br /> <br />KANUHA: Thank you, Members of the Commission. Duane Kanuha, Planning Director. Over <br />the years there have been projects that have been entitled for zoning changes, and in this area <br />primarily most of the properties that are entitled for future development also happen to be <br />situated within the Special Management Area, okay, this SMA area. The particular focus of the <br />Special Management Area is to take a look at development as it relates to coastal impacts, <br />impacts to the shoreline area, impacts to the coastal area. Special Management Area, it’s a <br />component of the State Coastal Zone Management Act. That being said, every project, most <br />projects that come in, particularly for entitlements for rezonings, are either required to or <br />voluntarily participating doing what they call a Traffic Impact Analysis Report, TIAR. That <br />report assesses the traffic impacts of that particular project on a local basis, okay, how the <br />turning movements into and out of the project affect major roadways in the vicinity, okay. So on <br />a case-by-case basis, the analysis for those traffic impact, analysis reports, is actually done by the <br />Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, okay. So we depend on their review of <br />those reports on a case-by-case basis and hopefully an accumulative basis, to give us some gauge <br />of what the impacts are on the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />In this particular section of Kona between Kailua and Keauhou much of the planning that has <br />been done in that area and as it relates to traffic impacts, have been contingent upon the <br />completion of the Ali‘i Drive realignment project. That’s been the case for maybe 35, 40, 50 <br />years, all right? However, in the past as various County administrations have moved to <br />implement that particular project, what it’s come down to is that there is enough significant <br />archaeological features, cultural features, within the right-of-way that to my knowledge they <br />have not been able to find a way to mitigate those or to adjust the realignment to account for that. <br />That’s been the reason that the project has been stalled. In anticipation of that being the case, <br />many projects who were entitled to the zoning process, were also required, whose properties <br />bisected the right-of-way, were also required to donate that portion of their property to the <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />