|
SHIMAOKA: I’ve got one. I just have a concern because I’ve lived here for several years and
<br />understand the traffic on Ali‘i Drive, and probably this is going to be to our Director here. Has
<br />there any study been made as far as just kind of like periodically checking the traffic and just the
<br />hazards or the amount of traffic that is going to cause time constrains or safety? Is the County
<br />involved in any kind of ongoing, because, I know because of the parkway not being built, I
<br />mean, I agree with the, it would be good to have a four-lane so that we can at least have more
<br />safe conditions on Ali‘i Drive. Because driving, especially during Ironman, yeah, I remember
<br />that, I was a police officer, that was really a nightmare, yeah, Ali‘i Drive, so.
<br />
<br />BRILHANTE: Thank you, Commissioner Shimaoka. I think I’m going to allow the Director to
<br />give information as it relates to there’s been any updated traffic studies, but again, I just want to
<br />reiterate this is a 19-unit project, you know, that the project was fully vetted in 2006 when the
<br />application first came forward. This is an SMA application. The basis of SMA application is the
<br />impacts of the project as it relates to the ocean and the coastline and the shoreline. The items
<br />with, related to a TIAR or traffic study would be more analogous to under requirements for
<br />Environmental Assessment or Impact Statement, and those items were vetted, you know, upon
<br />the submission of the original application as well. But, you know, that being said, I’ll allow the
<br />Director to provide any additional information as to whether or not there are any update reports
<br />to those traffic analysis.
<br />
<br />KANUHA: Thank you, Members of the Commission. Duane Kanuha, Planning Director. Over
<br />the years there have been projects that have been entitled for zoning changes, and in this area
<br />primarily most of the properties that are entitled for future development also happen to be
<br />situated within the Special Management Area, okay, this SMA area. The particular focus of the
<br />Special Management Area is to take a look at development as it relates to coastal impacts,
<br />impacts to the shoreline area, impacts to the coastal area. Special Management Area, it’s a
<br />component of the State Coastal Zone Management Act. That being said, every project, most
<br />projects that come in, particularly for entitlements for rezonings, are either required to or
<br />voluntarily participating doing what they call a Traffic Impact Analysis Report, TIAR. That
<br />report assesses the traffic impacts of that particular project on a local basis, okay, how the
<br />turning movements into and out of the project affect major roadways in the vicinity, okay. So on
<br />a case-by-case basis, the analysis for those traffic impact, analysis reports, is actually done by the
<br />Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, okay. So we depend on their review of
<br />those reports on a case-by-case basis and hopefully an accumulative basis, to give us some gauge
<br />of what the impacts are on the surrounding areas.
<br />
<br />In this particular section of Kona between Kailua and Keauhou much of the planning that has
<br />been done in that area and as it relates to traffic impacts, have been contingent upon the
<br />completion of the Ali‘i Drive realignment project. That’s been the case for maybe 35, 40, 50
<br />years, all right? However, in the past as various County administrations have moved to
<br />implement that particular project, what it’s come down to is that there is enough significant
<br />archaeological features, cultural features, within the right-of-way that to my knowledge they
<br />have not been able to find a way to mitigate those or to adjust the realignment to account for that.
<br />That’s been the reason that the project has been stalled. In anticipation of that being the case,
<br />many projects who were entitled to the zoning process, were also required, whose properties
<br />bisected the right-of-way, were also required to donate that portion of their property to the
<br />9
<br />EXHIBIT B
<br />
<br />
|