September 10, 2016 FINAL SC Minutes withMaps

Home

BUSINESS: 1. CDP Planning Process Update: Ms. Gloor summarized the meeting overview, went over the current timeline, and recapped the Draft CDP Community review process. The following were facts from the community review process: • 28 comments submitted via website or email • 10 written comments submitted to the Planning Dept. • 80 SpeakOut participants • 90 total Focused Discussion participants (there were 4 Focused Discussions) Ms. Gloor also outlined the remaining steps to the CDP Adoption: • Steering Committee recommendation of a final draft for approval by the County • Planning Director/Agency review and recommendations • Windward Planning Commission review and recommendations • County Council review and decision • Mayor's signature. Mr. Agres reviewed the format the Steering Committee would be using to throughout the meeting: • Facilitated discussions of options and proposed revisions • Incremental preliminary approval after each item • "Parking lot" issues not resolved will be revisited later in the meeting or saved for the next meeting. He also reminded Steering Committee members of their role in the review of community input and how to review the community input. Mr. Agres emphasized that the Steering Committee must remember to honor the process — honor the work that's been done and all of the public input received along the way. He advised that the SC members trust that the CDP process has allowed ample time for the community to engage and in order to maintain the integrity of the process moving forward, additional input should only be considered if it is new or verifiable. 2. Consideration of Proposed Revisions to Draft CDP Land Use Policies: Ms. Gloor explained the 4 documents in the review packet. Document #1 is a complete Summary of Community Input that is sorted by subject into the CDP format. Document #2 contains all Proposed Minor Edits and is a compilation of suggestions for improving formatting or policy wording — generally non -substantive edits. Document #3 encompasses the Proposed Revisions and Additions, these suggestions are consistent with the Community objectives and need Steering Committee review but not necessarily committee deliberation. Document #4 (Steering Committee Deliberations on Potential Revisions) is our starting place for today and is a compilation of issues that require Steering Committee deliberation. She then introduced a decision making tool to help the Steering Committee make informed decisions as they considered possible revisions to the Draft CDP. The online version of the decision making tool outlines the alternatives relative to objectives, factors, community input, and the Steering Community Deliberations from September 10, 2016. Page 14