My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-06-20 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2016
>
2016-06-20 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2016 10:10:47 AM
Creation date
10/25/2016 10:10:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br />Minutes — June 20, 2016 <br />TL: So another group outside of DLNR could do the same thing to undo this? <br />CY: Sure. <br />TL: OK. Would that be something that — at this point you have a lot of unhappy <br />people because and I can testify to this that DLNR and or maybe the <br />board does not listen to their constituency. I have a stack of signatures — <br />about 2,000 people on Puu Makaala, for example, that were disregarded <br />completely, I mean, it just, and there's no significant impact statement <br />where obviously it made a huge impact to an awful lot of people. And, you <br />know, you're abandoning these constituencies when you should be <br />serving them, I would think, right? <br />CY: Tom, you asked me to come here to talk to you about this Kaupulehu, and <br />I'm happy to do that but, ah, you know, I can't, I don't want to sit here and <br />talk about every issue that comes up with the DLNR and if you're talking — <br />if you're saying that, ah, we're not listening to people — there were a heck <br />of a lot of people and are a heck of a lot people who are strongly in favor <br />of this proposal — I understand — it's not that I — and I understand that <br />there are people who are against it — I'd hear that — it's not that I didn't <br />hear that — I heard it. <br />KD: Mr. Chair, I got couple of questions. Yeah, I hear a lot of times you saying <br />the residents, the residents. Who are these residents? <br />CY: Ah, names, you mean? <br />KD: No, no literally — what type of residents? <br />CY: Well, the people — some of the people who were really active in this were <br />Hannah Springer and Leinaala Lightner and members of their families. <br />KD: OK. See my concern is this, you know, this ten-year thing — what if it <br />doesn't actually work, then what? That's the question, you know? Say two <br />years from now, three years from now — it doesn't work — how do we get it <br />to be changed or stop? . <br />CY: There is a five-year review that's gonna happen at the Board level — like <br />where Aquatic Resources has to have a review. Basically in order to <br />change this rule before the ten years is up — it would be an administrative <br />rule change — that's how it would be done. <br />KD: OK. Cause see my whole thing is we looking at this area as the so called <br />being impact — been my area going get impact you going be problems, <br />you, for making that kind decisions, even though you one volunteer for <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.