Laserfiche WebLink
In response to Commissioner Ross’ inquiry, Mr. Mark stated that the recommended <br />Benjamin Moore Historic color palate is just a sample, and that the Commission has <br />rejected applicants’ colors in the past because they seemed inappropriate for the area. <br />He added that in this case if the proposed dark green looks too bold, the Commission can <br />request a more muted color. <br /> <br />Commissioner Au Hoy expressed her concern about runoff from the awning and possible <br />puddles and muddiness on the lawn caused by it, adding that she wasn’t sure whether or <br />not a French drain would be appropriate. Mr. Foster said he thinks the drainage will be <br />better with the awning because the current situation is that the runoff from the umbrellas <br />gathers in the center gutters and shoots on the lawn like a waterfall. In response to <br />Commissioner Ross’ question, Mr. Foster said that they have never experienced ponding. <br />Commissioner Andreae suggested that drainage gutters can be put onto the ground if the <br />problem arises, to which Mr. Foster agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ross commented that since the roof color can’t be matched with any of <br />the available colors, they could move away into something different, such as the color in <br />the landscaping, instead of choosing an almost-matching color. Commissioner Andreae <br />said that if it is their preference to match the roof to create some continuity, she would <br />encourage them to look further to do so. Mr. Foster responded that they would have a <br />better chance matching the building color than the roof color. Commissioner Hope <br />commented that a gray color matching the building will make their landscape pop, while <br />a big blotch of green will compete with it. In response to Commissioner Andreae’s <br />question whether a burgundy to complement their logo is an option, Mr. Foster said he <br />doesn’t see the right burgundy in the color samples. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ross confirmed the Commissioners’ consensus that the color should <br />match a building element, such as the roof or the walls, as opposed to the landscaping. <br />In supporting Mr. Foster’s idea to match the building, Commissioner Au Hoy suggested <br />he select a gray color that would blend better with the building. Mr. Foster mentioned <br />that neither Mr. Daniel nor he has a problem with getting the color changed, and selected <br />#502-8390 (Gray) from the canopy catalogue to match the walls. Commissioner Andreae <br />recommended him to select another color to match the roof as an alternative, and he <br />selected #502-8611 (Blue-Green) and #502-8552 (Turquoise) being the closest to the roof <br />color. His selection was agreeable to the Commissioners. <br /> <br />Action <br />It was moved by Commissioner Andreae and seconded by Commissioner Hope to <br />recommend to the Planning Director the approval of the proposed canopy, with the <br />following recommendation: <br /> <br /> The canopy shall be either (1) “Precontraint” #502-8390 (Gray) to match the walls of <br />the building, or (2) “Precontraint” #502-8611 (Blue-Green) or #502-8552 (Turquoise) <br />to match the roof. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was taken and motion carried with three ayes (Andreae, Hope and <br />Au Hoy). <br />3 <br /> <br />