My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Kristen Mahnke REZ 16-209
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-10-06 Hearing Transcript - Kristen Mahnke REZ 16-209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2016 8:27:43 AM
Creation date
11/4/2016 8:27:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CLARKSON: Okay, and where would the powerline be that is referred to in the letter from the <br />manager of KTA? <br />JACKSON: I believe the powerline of the pole is near Puainako, and then the line extends along <br />the rear property line between the subject property and KTA. <br />CLARKSON: Thank you. <br />HENKEL: Are there any other questions for staff? If not, will the Applicant and their <br />representative, and/or their representative come forward? <br />FUKE: Good morning, Mr. Chair. <br />HENKEL: Good morning, Mr. Fuke. For the record, can I sign you in again? Would you raise <br />your right hand <br />FUKE: Sure <br />HENKEL: —And, do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the <br />Planning Commission? <br />FUKE: Yes, I do. <br />HENKEL: Okay, thank you. <br />FUKE: Chair—good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. Again, my <br />name is Sidney Fuke. I live in Hilo. My business address is 100 Pauahi Street. The Applicant, <br />Kristen Mahnke, is also over here. <br />I'd just like to initially acknowledge that she has had a chance to review the staff's Background <br />Report and the recommended conditions and found them to be acceptable. However, in light of <br />what has transpired in the other application, then I guess in the interest of consistency, you know, <br />she would want to respectfully request similar consideration for proposed condition proposed <br />condition number [sic] F. Just to kind of like back track just a pit partially to answer <br />Commissioner Clarkson's question, you know, on the Ogasawara one, on the Pahoa Village, part <br />of the reason why Public Works came about with that recommendation is that the alignment <br />within the Pahoa Village area is not really fixed. You know, sometimes the road could be <br />encroaching within the private property. Then again, it may not. <br />We had a similar situation, not in Pahoa, but also up in the Kaumana area where the road actually <br />wasn't a private property, and so there was conditions to make that kind of accommodation. <br />Here on the Kilauea Avenue area, like in the House Lot's area, you know, where you have a <br />grid -like type of, you know, subdivision, the road alignment is pretty fixed so people know <br />where the centerline is unlike the Pahoa Village area. And, thus, like the Planning Director's <br />initial recommendation is that in situations where you know that there is gonna be growth, that it <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.