Laserfiche WebLink
and growth allowed for lirnteirpiredve flexliblilllity and was based, at least lin paint, on the challenges of careading <br />detailed irrrn«cps specffiic enough to deirrrnornstir«ate land use desligrna Borns at a paircell level. However, lby allowing <br />gemuer ll, lbllolb' s'tylle LUPAG maps, p ircells were o'f'ten split in -to various LUPAG designations in ways -tlh 't <br />were more arbitrary -tlh n -they were in'ten'tion ll. TINS, at dirrrnes, led to property ow nears desliirlirng clleareir <br />&rectliorn about tllheliir land use deslgrna Borns and future devellopirrrnernt optliorns and led some property ow nears to <br />seelk fuirtheir ILIIa nnl ng Depairtirrrnernt lirnteirpireta Borns of tllheliir property lin hella lion to the gerneir«SII CUIN G <br />deslgrna Borns„ INow that the CUP's Ihave the oppoirtunity and the technology to easlilly and a ffiickmtlly care«ate <br />paircell-specffiic CUIN G maps, lit lis a irrrnoire piroacdve plla nnl ng strategy to clearly airtlicull«ate LUPAG deslgrla lions <br />lin the l-l5rrrn51ku a CUP at a paircell Ileo( ll and decirease than prevalence of sphtfling LUPAG deslg na to ns airNtirairlilly„ <br />compellfiirng reason for an exceptlion to thus approach wound be unrllhern pairt of a paircell lis lin an Open JUIN G <br />deslgrna Born (such as unrllhern p«girt of a paircell lis unrlithlirn the State Land Use Cornseirvadorn &stikt — e.g.,along the <br />coastfiirne or lin irrrn«sulka forests). Any p«girt of a paircell that lis deslgrn« ted as LUPAG Open wound ireirrrn«Minn Open for <br />that specffiic «sirea of the paircell„ Otheir exceptliorns to thus paircell-specffiic strategy wound be unrllhern'the paircell lis <br />lairge and irrrnay meed to ireflect two (or irrrnoire) d0eirernt'types of LUPAG deslgrna Borns„ For exarrrnplle, unrllhern'the <br />paircell borders a town unrllheire pairs of lit wound be unrlithlirn the urban growth boundary, and yet the lairge paircell <br />stretches fairtheir lirnto agikulltuir«SII «sireas unrllheire an AgirlculltuiralI deslgrna Born lis appiropirl ate„ The CUP stirategy of <br />irrrn« lding paircell-specffiic LUPAG deslgrna Borns adds cllarlty, specffiiclty, and lirncire«uses transparency lirnto'the land <br />use deslgrna Born process and irrrnoire accurately ireflects the County's and the Coirrrnirrrnurnity"s land use goalIs and <br />16,01111cy 4 <br />"In carder to preserve larger lot agricultural lands for productive agricultural use, allow rural development can lands near <br />urban areas where an intermediate land use between residential and productive agricultural areas is consistent with the <br />surrounding uses and rural character <br />*COMMENTS: Both LDU and Rural can provide an intermediate land use or buffer between <br />more intensive uses and agriculture as stated by the CDP in Policy 5 above and Policy 4 below. <br />There are several ways the entire Kihalani Homestead can serve as an UGB (non -conforming <br />Ag 20; Urban; Rural) without having to be designated IAL. <br />The rationale cites General Plan Policy 14.1.30) to support "Taking parcel 055 out of LUP": <br />(D) Encourage urlb n develloprnen't within existing zoned areas allready served lby lb sic infrastructure, or chose <br />'to such areas, instead of scattered develloprnen't. <br />*COMMENT: The 2005 Laupahoehoe LUPAG which included parcel 055 in the LDU <br />designation was not "scattered" and reflected a rational land use designation for Kihalani <br />Homestead Road. Like parcels were treated equally; and there was a clear boundary for the <br />LDU (even though the IAL designation is not appropriate IN Kihalani Homestead but applies to <br />only the large agricultural parcels ABOVE THE TOP of Kihalani Homestead Road). <br />3B. putting TMK 35004055 into IAL: see part 2., above: "Applicability Of Important <br />Agricultural Lands Designation For TMK 35004055". Parcel 055 does not qualify as IAL <br />and should not be designated as such. <br />3C. The CDP declines to consider a Rural designation for the homestead lands: 3CI: CDP <br />Says: No Rural Is Proposed Because Kihalani Homestead Is Rural De Facto; 3C2: CDP <br />Says: There Is An Excess Of Rural Development In Mauka Agriculture; 3C3: The CDP <br />Cites Various Policies To Justify Not Considering A Rural Designation For Homestead <br />Parcels Including Kihalani Homestead <br />