Laserfiche WebLink
referred to by the CDP as "large agricultural lots" and "large productive agricultural <br />lands" (which would be at least 20 acres because that is the smallest confirming parcel that can <br />be created in Laupahoehoe mauka) should be considered for IAL designations. There are no <br />large or core (20 acres or more) agricultural lots along Kihalani Homestead Road which is Rural <br />the entire way to the top of the road. After the road terminates the large/core agricultural lands <br />spread out for many miles up the mountain. This should alleviate concerns that the "de facto <br />rural" parcels on Kihalani Homestead Road will clash with IAL agriculture. <br />compare "Factor 2: Minimize encroachment onto core agricultural lands. This second factor used in evaluating <br />LUPAG designations is based on Community Objective #2 which states: "Protect and restore viable <br />agricultural lands and resources," <br />2C. IAL Criteria: According to the County, the criteria for IAL includes: <br />1. parcels with better potential for sustained high agricultural yields because of soil type, <br />climate, topography, or other factors [for sustained high agricultural yields] <br />2. parcels that qualify as prime or unique (not usually applied to small or micro agriculture) <br />3. class B "good" soils (parcel 055 has a "C" rating along with most of Kihalani Homestead <br />Road) <br />4. USDA "fair" for two or more crops on an irrigated basis <br />The County recommends "the location of these lands should be verified by more detailed <br />mapping when considering specific land use decisions." <br />Additional State statutory and administrative criteria include: <br />1. lands that are producing sustained high agricultural yields (including soil quality, growing <br />conditions, productivity rating systems, adequate water, Hawaiian agriculture, lot size (critical <br />land mass), and proximity to markets, water, power <br />2. land that contributes to the State's economic base and produces agricultural commodities for <br />export or local consumption <br />3. such land that is fallow <br />None of these criteria match parcel 055 (see 2D IAL Criteria applied) <br />2D. IAL Criteria applied to parcel 055: Applying the IAL criteria for County and State that <br />pertains to parcel 055, a change of LUPAG designation and a change from LUP to IAL is not <br />warranted. <br />1. TOPOGRAPHY: 3.955 acre parcel; about half of it (2.328 acres) is a steep part that falls to <br />the gulch; CTAHR evaluates the steep part as possibly suitable for timber or grazing which may <br />not be feasible on 2.328 acres). Also the County is proposing a 10 acre parcel size to qualify <br />for an agricultural exemption for timber or grazing. Setting up timber or grazing would require <br />fences, grading and other supplies and labor which would require an investment of $20K or <br />more. <br />2. LOT SIZE (CRITICAL LAND MASS): The CDP Rationale refers to large agricultural lots <br />("preserve large productive agricultural lands") which would be at least 20 acres because <br />that is the smallest confirming parcel that can be created in Laupahoehoe mauka; 1.627 acres <br />for crops plus the marginal 2.328 acres in the back of the parcel is not "large". <br />