My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-01-05 Hearing Transcript - Jan Malasek GAF Claim
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-01-05 Hearing Transcript - Jan Malasek GAF Claim
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2017 12:24:48 PM
Creation date
2/1/2017 12:24:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HENKEL: And—and, I mean, I think what we're looking it is that it was so long ago, and that <br />you, I mean, you got the check and cashed it, right, so it, I mean, I don't know that it would be <br />legal for us to take further action at this point. <br />OLSON: Yeah, well the question is recourse. What is the recourse? <br />HENKEL: Yeah, use your microphone to talk please, Jon. <br />OLSON: You know, what is the question is, you know, does he—does he have any recourse? <br />mean to the point that the relocation process didn't, didn't even consider compensation for <br />agricultural product off of agricultural land. I mean, it was, the property was, is in ag. It is <br />agricultural land, yet the, their compensation program doesn't take any account to that. <br />HENKEL: Yeah, my point is that the recourse probably should have been eight years ago. <br />OLSON: Yeah, I'm not arguing that. <br />HENKEL: And, I mean—yes, Jan? <br />MALASEK: Well, I was not present when the last time when the Planning Commission dealt <br />about this, and when I came back few months after that, it said I had ten days to appeal the <br />ruling. It was already past ten days so it doesn't make any difference anymore, no? If I appeal <br />half year or a year later or when? I just. <br />HENKEL: Any other comments? Then, I guess we're ready for a motion to action. <br />CLARKSON: We have to close testimony. <br />HENKEL: I'm sorry, that, well is there any public testimony? You guys can return to your <br />seats, and nobody's signed up for public testimony so I'll look for a motion to close public <br />testimony. Thank you, Commissioner Clarkson. <br />MIYASATO: I make a motion to close public testimony. <br />CLARKSON: Second. <br />HENKEL: It's been moved by Commissioner Miyasato; seconded by Commissioner Clarkson to <br />close public testimony. All in favor, say aye. <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br />HENKEL: Opposed? Okay, public testimony is closed. Now, if there's any further discussion <br />and/or a motion for action would be the time. <br />CLARKSON: I'd like to make a motion. I move that the request for reconsideration be denied <br />based on Rules 12-6(f), 12-10(b), and 12-13, and their corresponding rules at the time with the <br />EXHIBIT D <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.