Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Roth reiterated his position that the proposed access location made the most sense <br />because of the road intersection and the sight distance. Commissioner Kern noted that street <br />parking was already prohibited along that particular stretch of Ali‘i Drive. She opined that the <br />proposed 115 parking spaces would accommodate all the parking needs of their guests, and that <br />many of their guests would probably choose to walk once checked in as there were various <br />attractions within walking distance. She added that she was thrilled to see this attractive project <br />happening at the site. Upon confirming with Mr. Herbert that the sidewalk would be right next to <br />the edge of the vehicle lane of Ali‘i Drive, Vice Chairman Roth pointed out that in order to do <br />street parking a motorist would have to drive over the high curb or the car would be within the <br />travel lane. He then recommended approving the proposal on a condition that the Kahakai Road <br />frontage be landscaped in a manner similar to what was shown on the Ali‘i Drive frontage. <br /> <br />Mr. Dunlap observed that the drawings did not show any trees in front of the porte cochère, and <br />asked Mr. Harry whether that was intentional or oversight. Mr. Harry responded that it was not <br />intentional except that the main purpose of the rendering was to show the architecture, and that he <br />would defer to the Commission’s recommendation. Vice Chairman Roth noted that there was an <br />exception in having no trees in that location for visibility purposes; the motorist would need a <br />clear view of the sidewalk as he/she pulled out of the porte cochère. Commissioner Kern also <br />pointed out that there might not be enough space for tree roots. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Kern that the Commission forward to the Planning Director a <br />recommendation for approval of the proposed project. In response to Commissioner Van Pernis’ <br />question as to whether or not a condition for landscaping should be included, Commissioner Kern <br />said that she was trying to avoid making the applicant come back for the Commission’s further <br />review. Vice Chairman Roth commented that the condition could be worded in such a way that <br />the applicant would not have to come back; for instance, the landscaping on all three sides should <br />be consistent with what was shown on Ali‘i Drive. Commissioner Van Pernis suggested that the <br />wording be further clarified by stating “all sides facing the public right-of-way.” Commissioner <br />Kern agreed to make that part of her motion, and Commissioner Sullenberger seconded the <br />motion. Commissioner Van Pernis asked if his abstention would make the motion fail and would <br />necessitate the applicant to come back for lack of a quorum. Mr. Mark answered that every <br />Commissioner, including the Vice Chairman in this case, had to vote. A roll call vote was taken <br />and the motion carried with five ayes (Kern, Sullenberger, Akina, Van Pernis and Roth) and three <br />absent and excused (Andreae, Au Hoy and Dahlberg). <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Finalize letter to Department of Public Works regarding enforcement of the Sign Code <br />within Kailua Village Special District. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Van Pernis and seconded by Commissioner Sullenberger that the <br />Commission finalize and sign the letter as circulated, including previously suggested revisions, <br />and that staff obtain signatures from the Commissioners who were not present, and send it out as <br />soon as possible. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />