My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-06-01 Liquor Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Liquor Control
>
Liquor Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-06-01 Liquor Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2017 2:10:30 PM
Creation date
7/12/2017 4:41:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Greenwell: Back to my question, this letter talks about a problem. I'm a little <br />concerned. Is there a problem with giving her a license if there's already drinking in the <br />park? I need some help here. <br />Takase: From what we can tell, there's not. We did have some other people from the <br />community come to see me and they were in support of her operation and them getting <br />a liquor license, however their concern was people buying liquor from the store and <br />hanging out at the park. Chances are truthfully, there are some people, but nobody <br />seems to think it's really a problem. She closes at 6:00 P.M., so it's not like they're <br />going to be there all night buying beer from her and hanging out. I don't anticipate it <br />being a problem. Other residents in the area are actually in support of her and it's not <br />something that we usually see too often. At this point, as a Department, we are willing <br />to give her a chance to run her operation. Like every other licensee, they are always <br />subject to coming back before the Commission if there are problems. Based on what's <br />here so far, based on her hours, we don't anticipate problems. I think she's looking for <br />mostly the local trade which is what the other residents are happy about, but also, the <br />tourists go to the Old Highway Inn. It would be a natural stop. You do have some <br />facilities on your patio? <br />Soli: We do, but we won't be serving at all. We don't want to serve on premises. We <br />will be very stringent on that. We are always moving back and forth to the patio so it <br />would be easy to monitor. If I might add something also, my family and I have lived in <br />Pepe`ekeo — well my family has always lived in Pepeekeo. The park being in the best <br />condition it can be is definitely a top priority to us. We wouldn't want to do anything to <br />hinder the quality of the neighborhood, especially because we're actually the closest <br />people to the park. We definitely took that into strong consideration when applying for <br />the license and what that would do. I feel like we really understand how that <br />neighborhood works and we're friends with a lot of people in the community so I feel we <br />have a good relationship and understanding. We have a vested interest in the <br />community in being safe and quiet at night. <br />Taniguchi: I move to close public hearing. <br />Greenwell: Second. <br />Mr. Taniguchi moved that the public hearing on Application No. 16-25 <br />be closed; seconded by Mr. Greenwell. <br />Takaba: Moved and seconded to close public hearing. Any discussion? <br />There was no discussion from the Commissioners. <br />Takaba: Hearing none. All those in favor say "Aye." <br />The Commissioners voted "Aye." <br />Takaba: Those opposed "Nay." <br />JUNE 1, 2017- LIQUOR COMMISSION MINUTES <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.