My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-11-02 Hearing Transcript - PD Initiated Pre-Existing Lot Determination
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-11-02 Hearing Transcript - PD Initiated Pre-Existing Lot Determination
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 3:20:16 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 3:20:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
seem like it is a lot of record through the Planning Department even though we don't have a <br />number to say that it was a legitimate subdivision. <br />HENKEL: Okay, I'm a little more understanding now. I mean, I was wondering if there's such <br />a place as Orchid Isle Subdivision. That's up near Volcano, I think, right? Orchid Isle <br />Subdivision. <br />GAGORIK: It's further, yeah, going up <br />HENKEL: —And they've been paying taxes. There is some development even though it's <br />probably substandard. <br />GAGORIK: Yeah, right. <br />HENKEL: Like the other 1960's subdivisions. And they have a road maintenance corporation <br />probably? <br />GAGORIK: Probably, most likely they'll have a road maintenance. And in the last maybe six <br />months or so, we've had multiple requests from individuals where they will ask us can you <br />determine if this is a lot of record, and when we go through all our files, we don't have any <br />legitimate subdivision and we see that these individuals have—it's been owned by multiple <br />people, there was a building permit taken out on this, they've been paying taxes all these years, <br />and we actually had to say no, you're not a lot of record! And, it hurts us, too, as a planning <br />department, but we have to follow the law, and that's why we wanted to add these conditions so <br />that it would recognize those lots that are under these circumstances. <br />CLARKSON: Well, what is a lot of record then? I mean, obviously, the Tax Department <br />thought they were a lot. The Building Department thought they were a lot. The State thinks that <br />they're a lot, the Bureau of Conveyances. What, what do theyso, the only difference between <br />a lot and a lot of record is one that has a number assigned by the Planning Department? <br />GAGORIK: And, there are other situations that are explained in this section of the Code also. <br />Prior to the Subdivision Code becoming approved as through ordinance, there was a Traffic <br />Commission way back in the forties that was under the Department of Public Works, and they <br />approved subdivisions. So, there are some records with that, that we can go back to, but we <br />don't have a complete record which is why we included that section to recognize that there may <br />be some lots that were created before the Subdivision Code. But people have to come to us with <br />background information to support their request that it would be a lot of record, and they usually <br />have some deeds and things of that sort to recognize that the property had existed. <br />CLARKSON: One more question. Then, why, why is it bad if you can sell it, you're getting <br />taxed on it and all that other stuff, why do people need it to be a lot of record? Why do they <br />want that title added to their property? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.