My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-10-30 Hearing Transcript - Amendments to PC Rule 9 (Joint Meeting)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2017
>
2017-10-30 Hearing Transcript - Amendments to PC Rule 9 (Joint Meeting)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 3:27:01 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 3:26:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HALL: Self, Self. <br />HENKEL: Amy Self, I'm sorry. <br />SELF: I like that last name, Smart. Better than Self Amy Self, Deputy Corporation Counsel. <br />I'm the Corporation Counsel assigned to the Planning Department, so I advise the Planning <br />Department. So, I'd like to bring your attention to HRS 205A-27 which is the designation of <br />Special Management Area authority. Okay, and you are the authority that is designated under <br />this section. Under that section it says the authority, meaning the Planning Commission, is <br />designated to Special Management Area authority and is authorized to carry out the objectives, <br />policies, and procedures of this part. <br />So, in other words, the State Legislature made the planning commissions of the counties the <br />authority to carry out the objectives of 205A. So, if you look at the objectives of 205A and the <br />policies and procedures that includes the definitions of what development is and what <br />development is not. So, in other words, when the State law changes, this 205A chapter, it's <br />assumed that the authority is going to still carry out the objectives, policies, and procedures of <br />this part regardless of how it is when it was first written because it's going to be amended from <br />time to time. But, it's, you know, the authority's job is to carry out the intent of 205A which will <br />from time to time be amended by the State Legislature. <br />I hope I didn't make things worse <br />HENKEL: Any questions from Leeward? <br />DARROW: If I can just <br />KAY: Not that I see here, Mr. Chair. <br />HENKEL: Okay. Windward? Go ahead, Jeff <br />DARROW: So, just touching base with what Joe is mentioning, and I believe you are correct. <br />The definition remains the same. You have a definition that's been changed from minor permit <br />up to 500,000. Anything beyond that is a major use permit. Currently, the authority for, you <br />have designated the Planning Department, Planning Director with the authority to administer the <br />applications for the minor permits. If you changed your rule or if, if it remained the same, and <br />minor permits could only be issued by the Planning Director at 125,000, we would have to come <br />up with a process to be able to bring anything beyond that to the Planning Commission. <br />Currently, we don't have that process in place. We have the process in place for the Planning <br />Department but not for minor permits to go to the Planning Commission. <br />SELF: May I add one other thing. Maija just explained to me what you're actually asking. The <br />reason I had stated what I just stated was to let you know that, yeah, your job is to carry out <br />205A, but you have the ability to delegate whatever, whatever authority you have toI mean, <br />you can delegate whatever you want. But, the problem with delegating the authority to the <br />Planning Director for an amount that is less than what 205A has, because they've amended it, it <br />EXHIBIT A <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.