2017-11-29 BDHRA Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

opportunities, we need to be maximize flexibility. The good thing about those private parcels, the HELCO and the Ice House, is that any endeavors to develop those properties would be the responsibility of those private land owners, and we wouldn't be contributing to an EIS to effectuate that because they are limited to their own footprint as well. I think the real, the EIS goes more in terms of I'm just talking out loud here, but to me, it really is, if you're going to develop any major structures on the golf course, I think that would require a significant EIS. But all the rest of the hotel sites, etcetera, I don't see the need for a because it's not a change of use. But to change the open area and maybe build a structure, that might trigger a need for an EIS. ARAI: Yeah, it's a matter of scale. DELIMA: Right. ARAI: And scope, right, I mean, there's certain things if it's relegated to repair and maintenance, whatever, that yeah, there are exemption provisions. But depending on what you're doing, if you wanted to go higher, bigger, longer, wider, you know then there—it could be subject to. We just have to determine whether or not DELIMA: That's why I kind of am—in my initial comments today I'm, I want us to be realistic in how we try to address the concept of a master plan. Because if the request for interest is limited to the area that the Department is going to focus upon, then perhaps we can call that master plan area"A" and then incrementally increase, depending upon the availability of funds and interest. Anyway, I talked enough today. Does anyone have any other questions or comments? Okay, go ahead Daryn. ARAI: So, and again, as anybody in attendance as well, if you have any suggestions, comments, you know, by all means feel free to send them to me or Lucas and we'll pass it on to the team that's working on the General Plan. There you go, that's our contact information. Mahalo. DELIMA: I appreciate everybody's comments today, and then again, our next matter was to approve of the minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 1. Approval of minutes from the October 25, 2017, Banyan Drive Hawai`i Redevelopment Agency meeting. DELIMA: Can I have a motion to approve the minutes as circulated? I guess Elmer, you have to make a motion. GOROSPE: Yeah, move to accept. DELIMA: Nathan can you second it. GADDIS: Yeah, I'll second. DELIMA: Any discussion? Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. ALL: Aye. Page 9 of 10 Banyan Drive Hawaii Redevelopment Agency November 29,2017 Minutes