Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Roth stated that the goals for architectural designs and public spaces, listed in the <br />written presentation are appropriate, however, these goals are not carried out in the design. The <br />project is mostly inward facing and does not take into consideration the goal of connecting to the <br />residents of Kailua-Kona. The design does not meet the spirit of the “Kona Way of Life”. The <br />project does not seem like a village since the scale in out of proportion in that the entrances are <br />too large and not of human scale. Also, the two (2) story buildings do not indicate any roof <br />overhang and the smaller buildings are out of scale with their large roofs. <br />At this time Commissioner Roth read a letter from Commissioner John Hetherington with <br />comments concerning this submittal into record. Commissioner Hetherington’s greatest concern <br />was the flat roofs on the largest buildings with no visible roofing such as mansards around the <br />perimeter of the flat roofing. This is not consistent with the Kailua-Kona Master Plan from <br />1994. Commissioner Van Pernis moved to accept the letter into record and Commissioner <br />Sullenberger seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous by the Commission. .A copy of <br />Commissioner Hetherington’s letter is attached to these minutes. <br />Commissioner Crusat commented that there were no plans/designs for the proposed lighting for <br />the project and also expressed concern of how the proposed plans are geared to the pedestrian. <br />Commissioner Sullenberger also asked for clarification on the status of the project and <br />questioned the location and space or square footage of the gathering tower as a place to have <br />functions – he also expressed concern over the lack of plans/design elements for back of the <br />buildings that face roadways/walkways/pedestrians. He also expressed that he would like to see <br />more articulation of the plans towards being a village center. Commissioner Roth also <br />commented of this lack of integration of these plans with the rest of the village – a specific point <br />made was that the project let the letter and function of the requirements but not the spirit. <br />Mr. Ng, architect, indicated that the trellis was to help break up the large scale of the buildings, <br />but are not continuous along the walkway. Commissioner Roth said this is also a problem as the <br />scale of the large building continues to dominate the pedestrian walkway where the trellis is <br />missing <br />Linda Schatz commented that they are trying to balance the design and function with budgetary <br />restraints. <br />Commissioner Kern said that the design criteria stated in the drawings shows good intentions, <br />however, the design does not show execution of these criteria. Commissioner Kern further stated <br />that she sees the research that was made into the Kona District/Area but that the plans need to <br />reflect this better. <br />Commissioner Roth also noted that the spaces as designed are not effective for public use. Also <br />the bus stop is not safe since it is proposed adjacent to the large gasoline filling facility location. <br />Commissioner Van Pernis also expressed concern over the location of the bus stop and the gas <br />station. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />