Laserfiche WebLink
Chair Young expressed that the County should prioritize servicing the communities that are <br />already established [such as Ho'okena Village] before considering extending the waterline for <br />new developments. He also stated that he hasn't seen a lack of water impact the prospect of <br />new development and that he feels the area experiences enough rainfall to support most of the <br />crops grown there [coffee, sweet potato, etc.] <br />Vice -Chair David expressed concern that by considering deleting policies the Committee is <br />straying too far beyond just changing "shalls" and "shoulds". <br />Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen asked the AC if they had a unanimous agreement to keep <br />their recommendation regarding this policy as stated in the subcommittee report. The group <br />responded favorably and no objections were heard. <br />Policy PUB -4.5: Wastewater Treatment and Effluent Reuse. <br />Committee Member Kimura suggested changing the word "of" in this policy to "from" to enable <br />developments located adjacent to Hina Lani Street to connect to the Kealakehe Sewer <br />Treatment system. She believed this would allow development on the north side of Hina Lani to <br />connect and therefore could reduce negative environmental impacts. <br />Committee Member Rivera suggested removing the word "south" from this policy to further <br />reinforce this intent. <br />Committee Member Palacat-Nelsen asked the Committee if they had a unanimous agreement <br />to change the word "of" to "from" and to delete the word "south" in the Action Committee's <br />recommendation regarding this policy. The group responded favorably and no objections were <br />heard. <br />PolicyTRAN-1.1: Official Transportation Network Map & PolicyTRAN-6.1: Official Concurrency Map. <br />Committee Member Rivera read the summary of Roy Takemoto's explanation of the <br />concurrency requirements as written in the February 21 minutes and asked for clarification. Mr. <br />Takemoto explained that the current concurrency requirements exceed what is proportional to <br />the impact of development, and that developers are often either expected to wait until the <br />government can initiate construction or else opt to construct the roadway themselves. He also <br />stated that development agreements are utilized for larger projects. <br />Mr. Takemoto explained that his version of the policy reduces the burden on developers of <br />having to build these roadway improvements and instead requires them to define a right-of-way <br />through metes and bounds. He reiterated his previous statement that there are sections of the <br />concurrency map where the alignment is not clearly defined. <br />Mr. Takemoto went on to suggest that funds from the Fair Share account could be used to do <br />the preliminary engineering for these roadways. <br />Mr. Takemoto also explained that his policy also creates consistency with the Zoning Code in <br />which concurrency requirements kick in once a project triggers the Zoning Code requirement to <br />present a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) a part of a rezoning application. <br />Mr. Takemoto suggested that the segment of text that the subcommittee proposed moving <br />from TRAN-1.1 to TRAN-6.1 [colored in green on the report], would be best kept where it was <br />originally written [TRAN-1.1]. He explained that this is because the Official Transportation Map <br />[TRAN-1.1] applies to the whole district of Kona whereas the Official Concurrency Map [TRAN- <br />www.hiplanninj dept.com kona(aihawaiicounty.Qov Page 3 <br />