Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Goodenow: Okay right…thank you…and so we go to 2-85…that’s the contract <br /> section…and…right…a County agency may enter into a contract <br /> involving services or property or procure, dispose of goods or <br /> services or construction with an officer or employee or a business <br /> in which an officer or employees immediate family has a <br /> controlling interest…so to me that sounds like we’re talking about <br /> a situation where…I’m an employee and my brother owns a <br /> company and we’re gonna do a contract right or vice-versa my <br /> brother’s the employee and I’m doing the contract…so it doesn’t <br /> really fit maybe your situation and…but I want to make sure I get <br /> it straight from you what you feel in 2-85 has been violated so we <br /> can really address it to be sure that you’re satisfied with our <br /> decision…. <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: The…in that section it says…it’s by any contract for services but it <br /> also says…provided that any…provided that in any action to avoid <br /> a contract pursuant to this section…the interest of third parties <br /> maybe damaged…I’m a third party…I’m going to be <br /> damaged…I’m a tax payer…I’m going to be damaged… <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Sorry…you want to respond to that… <br /> <br /> Mr. Robinson: I just want to go back and…you’re right you’re a tax payer like all <br /> are tax payers but you know in 2-85 contracts…where it says may <br /> not enter into a contract involving services or property etc…with <br /> an officer, an employee or business so it’s…not just a <br /> corporation…it would be or employee or with an officer, an <br /> employee or a business…. <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Right with an officer or employees immediate family has a <br /> controlling interest but she’s not an employee… <br /> <br /> Mr. Robinson: With an officer, an employee or a business and then the business <br /> that part is in the entirety or business in which an officer or <br /> employee or the officer’s immediate family has controlling <br /> interest…but it talks about an officer, an employee or a business <br /> and so in this case it’s talking about an employee and in her <br /> mind…correct me if I’m wrong but you’re saying this being with <br /> an individual so you’re saying this contract with the individual… <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: With an individual employee… <br /> <br /> Mr. Robinson: Right so as I understand… <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: That’s how I’m looking at it… <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br /> <br />