Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Ms. Novak: No. <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: If you want to show us the language…the sections… <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: Seeking other employment…this section 2-83(b)(1)…seeking <br /> other employment or contract for services for oneself…now how <br /> she did that was… <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Can I read this full…so it’s “b”… <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: Yes…. <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: No officer or employee shall use or attempt to use the officers or <br /> employee’s official position to secure or grant unwarranted <br /> privileges, exemptions, advantages, contracts, or treatment for <br /> oneself or others, including but not limited to the <br /> following…seeking other employment or contract for services for <br /> oneself by the use or attempted use of the officer’s or employee’s <br /> office or position so… <br /> <br /> Ms. Novak: What she did was…she knew she was going to retire…she knew <br /> what she either gonna retire or quit…she…wanted this contract <br /> and so for a whole year she was the only person involved in this <br /> project…this Energov project…we…I mean everybody knew she <br /> was gonna go one way or the other…so she specifically allowed <br /> herself because she had no one else to…report to so she went to all <br /> the meetings…she got involved in this project to the point where <br /> everybody thought oh we need to keep her on because she’s so <br /> valuable to this project…no she isn’t… <br /> <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Do you dispute though Mr. Brilhante statement that actually the <br /> department or actually sought her and it wasn’t really her idea but <br /> it was the department’s idea to do it…again the issue here is she is <br /> not the respondent…it’s only…did the department use it’s position <br /> right but that doesn’t really fit…I’m sorry I respect what you’re <br /> trying to do and say…but it doesn’t really fit the code here that it’s <br /> not really a violation…that’s just how I see it…I don’t know if <br /> there any other questions or…I’m fulling encourage further <br /> discussion…I don’t know too if our Corp. Counsel wants to chime <br /> in on this but…I mean you gotta find a provision and again it’s not <br /> that she used her position because she’s not the party…is did the <br /> department and that doesn’t apply…their not an employee right…it <br /> would be maybe because the director is her friend or something <br /> and you have some evidence you really…we don’t really have <br /> that… <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br /> <br />