My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-06-07 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 17-074
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2018
>
2018-06-07 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon Wireless USE 17-074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2018 1:53:15 PM
Creation date
7/5/2018 1:53:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MARTIN: My name is Danette Martin. <br />DE LA GARZA: I am Adrian de la Garza. I'm a System Performance Engineer with Verizon <br />Wireless. <br />CLARKSON: Mr. de la Garza— <br />DE LA GARZA: And thank you for hearing us this morning <br />CLARKSON: You're very welcome. <br />DE LA GARZA: Appreciate your time. <br />CLARKSON: So, there was some discussion in the last meeting and some testimony regarding <br />the availability of alternative sites that were not in a heavily residential area, some park areas, <br />some vacant land, but it was asserted that those sites would not be acceptable because the <br />coverage would be inadequate from any location other than the proposed location. But, my <br />question is, isn't coverage somewhat, not totally, but somewhat affected by the height of the <br />antenna? <br />DE LA GARZA: Yes. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, and so wouldn't it be possible to go away from this location and get <br />adequate coverage with a higher antenna height? <br />DE LA GARZA: Possibly, but I would have to look at the modeling, but I don't really think so. <br />I can say with certainty that this location is ideal for us because of the footprint that that site <br />provides, fills in our coverage gaps, and it also kind of blends nicely with what sites we have and <br />in our future planned sites. <br />As far as moving to another location, just raising the height, with consideration of the height of <br />the trees, I don't think it's going to be a viable option, and I think the location that we picked is <br />from a coverage perspective is ideal for us and how we plan to cover that neighborhood. <br />CLARKSON: Okay, are there—thank you. Are there any other questions at this time from the <br />Commissioners, other Commissioners? <br />AGUINALDO: I do. <br />HATA-FINLEY: It's on. <br />HALL: It's on. <br />AGUINALDO: As far as that other site you said is not viable, any other location from what you <br />guys are proposing on that lot versus say the park because the park was kind of presented. Can <br />EXHIBIT A <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.