My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-06-23 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-06-23 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:59:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 10 of 12 <br />that’s all. <br />TURNER: Well, I think that rumor’s going around that’s a "what if" scenario that’s being considered <br />and all I hear is universal opposition to that. When you work it backwards, the requirements, that isn’t <br />enough time to have a democratic process. So I urge you to not even consider that. <br />A couple of people have raised a good question of when do things take effect. Do we elect a Mayor and <br />they’re only in office for a second and then they are out of office because we have a new process. I think <br />it’s pretty easy to (1) make these decisions in the best interest of the community and a democratic <br />process and then (2) you can specify in the law that you’re passing, when they will take effect. You <br />could say that the Mayor will cease to exist in the year 2002 or 2004 or whatever you choose, and you’re <br />bright folks and I think you can do a better job than we did ten years ago and have the timing blow up in <br />their face and suddenly you got elected and your term was different and you didn’t even know it. So if <br />you think it through and you’re raising the right questions, I think we can do a good job but an election <br />before November 2000 which is only sixteen, seventeen months away, is just ludicrous. If you have any <br />opinion one way or the other about cave people, remember that they’re all CAVERs, that’s Citizens <br />Against Virtually Every Ripoff and that would be just too fast of a process. I urge you strongly to don’t <br />even think about that. <br />So there are several questions I’ve heard already tonight about Council Manager, process, <br />partisan/nonpartisan, length of Council terms. I think those are all good things we shouldn’t be deciding <br />up-front but asking a lot of questions about and I applaud the process that you’ve outlined. In answer to <br />Kevin’s question about having a five-ninth’s majority select a Council Manager or a City Manager, it <br />seems to me simple enough to have a super majority that’s appropriate. I don’t know if that’s 6 or 7 but <br />I’m thinking more and more that our society, our American democracy, question mark, really is a <br />tyranny of the majority. We don’t want to do things with a 51% majority, we want to set up a system <br />that forces us to spend enough time to come to a consensus that we agree and then we work together and <br />get something done. And anything you can do as you’re considering all these proposals that will work <br />towards that end, I think, is going to help the community and if it’s well thought out and aimed at <br />forming consensus and problem solving instead of maintaining power control with the barest of majority <br />or minority, then maybe this bundle will be easier to pass. And I know last time it seems like there were <br />a couple loaded things that went through and something wasn’t supposed to get approved and it did and <br />then something else, you know. The community’s awake now and I don’t think there’s a chance <br />anymore to slip anything in and I know there are pressures from different quarters to achieve different <br />objectives and I think it’s time to make this a truly open citizen process for citizen government. Thank <br />you. <br />RAY: Any questions? Yes, Marni. <br />HERKES: Jeff, several of your comments were what we do. We will not be doing anything but drafting <br />up proposals. It will be an elected process. It will be voting. We won’t do anything. You will do it. You, <br />the voters, will do it and so every time somebody comes up and says what we do, we’re just here to kind <br />of collect testimony and to come out with some kinds of consensus as to the kinds of things that we’re <br />hearing and that’s why we’re asking a lot of questions is so that we can kind of delve into what you’re <br />really thinking so that we can start to do that process. <br />TURNER: Right and I appreciate that and the time you’re all putting in however, you’re going to write <br />legislation that we get an up or down vote and we don’t get to modify it or amend it and that’s what this <br />process is for is - <br />HERKES: That’s what you’re doing tonight. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 6-23-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.