My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-06-23 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-06-23 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 3:59:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 11 of 12 <br />TURNER: Right. <br />RAY: Mr. Santangelo. <br />SANTANGELO: <br />Got a couple of things. I’m sure it was just a grammatical but you said reach consensus in which we all <br />agree and consensus isn’t when you agree. <br />TURNER: Well yes, I was taking that to an illogical extreme. Reach some substantial degree of <br />consensus that will work. <br />SANTANGELO: <br />All right. And as far as democracy by tyranny. Again, because this is my pet peeve, I just want to share <br />some of my strong beliefs. It’s to the Republic for which it stands, we stand. Okay? A republic is ruled <br />by majority with consideration of the minority so we too often throw democracy out there but what I’m <br />about and what most of us are about are a republic and as far as the political process, believe me, it’s far <br />too, I get a little defensive, but it’s far too blown up to say that there’s any sort of subversive thing going <br />on to influence us to do things. Mr. Ray is a great Chair. We chose him because of his universality with <br />East and West Hawaii and this whole committee universally, is really trying to do it’s best to get input <br />and anything substantial will come back out to you. Okay? <br />TURNER: I’m sure you are and there are pressures that will abound. <br />SANTANGELO: <br />So thank you. <br />RAY: Any more questions? All right, well if there’s no - <br />TURNER: I’ve one comment I forgot. One specific. I would like to see a consideration of reducing the <br />signature requirement for a referendum and initiative from 15% to 10%. You don’t want to have a <br />frivolous process that has that threshold too low but 15% is a formidable hurdle and it effectively nearly <br />eliminates referendum and initiative. We’ve have one but that’s an awful lot of work. <br />RAY: What about a 100 signatures to move an impeachment? What do you think about that? <br />TURNER: No, I don’t think so. I think the thing to do is to consider scaling it back one gradient at a <br />time. We don’t want to jump to 5% but if you move it from 15% to 10%, we’ll see for ten years if we <br />get inundated with initiatives or if there’s only one or two and so ease our way into that and make it <br />more able for people to have a voice without an undue burden to get your toe in the door and get that out <br />there. Thank you. <br />TOWLE: I have one last comment. <br />RAY: Okay. <br />TOWLE: I want to thank all of you for taking your time and doing this because I do a lot of volunteer <br />work and it’s very frustrating because you have a lot of people out there that say why don’t and why <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 6-23-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.