My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999-09-29 Charter Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Charter Commission
>
2000
>
Minutes
>
1999-09-29 Charter Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2011 4:08:38 PM
Creation date
7/1/2011 4:08:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HAWAII COUNTY CHARTER COMMISSIONPage 26 of 51 <br />BALOG: Well, you made the statement that some things is the Council’s kuleana and you only need to <br />look at - <br />RAY: You said established by ordinance, you have to establish by ordinance - <br />GOLDSTEIN: Yes, but if we transfer the Board of Appeals to Public Works, that requires a Charter <br />Amendment because, I believe, it says that the Board of Appeals, although it hears both appeals from the <br />Planning Director and the Chief Engineer, is administratively housed in the Planning Department, so if <br />we suggest that further change, it does mean one more Charter Amendment. That’s the only - <br />BALOG: I know, but a question was asked about the subdivision, you said that - <br />GOLDSTEIN: That’s - yes. <br />BALOG: I just don’t understand that if an Amendment is made to the Charter, why does the Council <br />have to approve that Amendment? <br />GOLDSTEIN: They don’t have to approve that particular Amendment. What would have to happen with <br />a subdivision code, itself, is that the changes by ordinance have to be made so that it reads that the <br />authority is with the Chief Engineer. Those are the ordinance kinds of changes that would have to take <br />place. <br />RAY: So, in other words, what we do with the Charter is get it out of Planning. They would have to take <br />that step. <br />GOLDSTEIN: That’s it. The further implementation of the Charter Amendment would be that they’d <br />have to - <br />BALOG: Of course, the Council could agree. Five people could agree to do that. <br />GOLDSTEIN: You’re running the risk, if you’re asking me, yes. They might not agree and then what <br />happens? I don’t know. <br />BALOG: Okay, the other question I had, is kind of following up to his comment, was would it more <br />favorable, just as an administrator or someone who works in government, to have the Administration be <br />flexible enough to make changes? Instead of going through all of this just for this one specific item, it <br />could be much more broadened. We’re dealing right now with subdivisions. The next department comes <br />in and says, well, let’s do this and this and this, and tinker with this. It seems to me, if the <br />Administration had the flexibility to make changes, you might be better off. Yes or no? <br />GOLDSTEIN: As I said though, I think that might work for some agencies, but I think that when you <br />look at those that essentially advise both Council and the Mayor, I think those, in principle, should have <br />some sort of confirmation of those changes by the Council also. I think it does provide flexibility, yes, <br />but I do think that you need to go - <br />BALOG: So, Administration would make a proposal and the Council would have to affirm that <br />proposal. <br />GOLDSTEIN: Yes. <br />file://\\coh01\cohweb\council\charter_commission\minutes\minutes 9-29-99.html7/1/2011 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.